Sparkle

REGISTRATION N° 11387724

ISSN L 2953-3112

VOLUME 12 - NUMBER 3

April - May 2024

Insights Journal

TEACHERS´ FORUM

“READING: THE KEY TO SUCCESS, BETTER LIFE, AND EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES"





CONTRIBUTING EDITOR´S INSIGHTS | Contributing editor´s writing and suggested activities about the topic under discussion as support for teaching practices


INSIDE TOPIC - GUEST SPEAKER´S INSIGHTS | The current topic developed by the guest speaker during the discussion session


CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´ RESEARCH | Focuses on guest writers´ research based on teaching English


CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS | Guest writers´articles about the topic under discussion


TEACHERS´ COLLABORATIVE CORNER | TALK ABOUT IT | COMPARE AND CONTRAST | CONTRIBUTE | Contributions made by teachers around the globe


IELTA REGISTRATION NUMBER

11387724

ORCID REGISTRATION CODE

0000-0002-4467-5451

TEACHERS´

FORUM

Insights Journal

EDITOR IN CHIEF

Yuliana I. Vásquez G. - Panama


EDITORIAL REVIEW BOARD

Paulina Kazmierczak Majdzinska - Poland

Doreen Dela Agbedoe - Ghana

Doris Younes Ahkar - Lebanon

Salman Rajput Siraj - Pakistan


CONTRIBUTING EDITORS AND REVISERS

Afsheen Salahuddin - Pakistan



IELTA Teachers Forum Journal, published monthly by the Research Development Department and the Teachers Development Department of the International English Language Teachers Association. It is distributed for free online. Questions about subscriptions should be addressed to the Research Development Department and the Teachers Development Department coordinators of the International English Language Teachers Association. Annual subscriptions to the association to individuals are free of cost.




Find us on https://www.ieltassociation.org


Teachers Forum Website: https:sites.google.com/view/ielta-teachersforum


Facebook page: https://web.facebook.com/ieltassociation

Volume 12 | Number 3 | 2024

CONTRIBUTING EDITOR´S INSIGHTS

“Unlocking Potential: Reading for Success”

Yuliana I. Vásquez G. - Panama

ITFIJ Editor in Chief


INSIDE TOPIC - GUEST SPEAKER´S INSIGHTS

"Reading, the Key to Success, Better Life, and Educational Outcomes"

Neil Arévalo Alcántara

Peru

ITFIJ Guest Speaker of the session

IELTA President


CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Focuses on guest writers´ research based on teaching English

"Effective Methods to Teach Reading in English to 5-7-Year-Old Kids, Penonome, 2023“

Yariadna Rodríguez; Angie Rojas; María Saavedra

Panama


“Oral and Silent Reading Strategies on the Level of Reading Comprehension of Grade 7 Students“

Alcantara, Aliah Krizzel A., Calcetas, Jasmine Joy B., Canino, Angeline Grace B. Gonzaga, Claire Ann B., Hernandez, Jhanna Grace Dyan S., Reyes, Jovelle M., Zulueta, Jannelle G.

Philippines


"Refining English Sophomore Students´ Communicative Skills through Inferential Reading at Centro Regional Universitario de Coclé, 2024."

María Fernández; Wendy Flores; Naomi Herrera

Panama


“Enhancement on Selected Grade 8 Students’ Reading Comprehension Using Collaborative Learning Technique in Don Manuel Rivera Memorial Integrated National High School“

GBaran, Kim Reymar M., Espinosa, Marian F. Fernandez, Jemilyn O., Gaceta, Angel Mary Rose E., Garin, Archie V., Guerta, Jobert B., Reyes, Jovelle M., Solito, Jenny Ann E.

Philippines



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

Volume 12 | Number 3 | 2024

"Academic Reading for Seeking Learning Opportunities”

Gabriel Rodríguez; Marisstella Guevara; Alcibiades Reyes

Panama


“Plight of Challenged Readers Age Ranges from 13-15 years old: Basis for Proposed Intervention Program, June 2023”

Cubacob, Dharline T., Oriel, Patricia S., Pereja, Kyla D.

Poonin, Althea Marie, Santos, Jewel P.

Philippines



CONTRIBUTING WRITERS INSIGHTS

Guest writers’ articles about the topic under discussion


“EdTech Embeddedness: Empowering Critical and Analytical Reading among English Language Learners (ELLs) of Pakistan“

Imran Hussain

Pakistan


"Reading, the Key to Success, Better Life, and Educational Outcomes”

Sandra Mensah Obeng

Ghana



TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

TALK ABOUT IT | COMPARE AND CONTRAST | CONTRIBUTE

Contributions made by teachers around the globe based on experience and real-life situations


William Enrique Garboza Aguilar – Perú

Anna Kosenko - Ukraine

Jordi Sevillano Del Rosario – Panamá

Barnabas Abangbere Atibiro – Ghana

Shayira Sánchez - Panamá

Zeboniso Murodova – Tajikistan

Jomar Calixto Catano - Philippines





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

REMARKS FOR THE TEACHERS

The Teachers' Forum is a space for teachers to express and share their teaching practices and experiences in Education based on work and research on the current topic under discussion.

After Zoom and Facebook Live interactions to talk about a current teaching issue or practice, teachers provide their insights for this journal to contribute and exchange ideas with other teachers worldwide.


CONTRIBUTING EDITOR´S INSIGHTS

Corresponds to the contributing editor´s writing and suggested activities about the topic under discussion as support for teaching practices.


INSIDE TOPIC - GUEST SPEAKER´S INSIGHTS

The current topic developed by the guest speaker during the discussion session


CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´ RESEARCH

Focuses on guest writers´ research based on teaching English.


CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´ INSIGHTS

Guest writers´ practical and innovative ideas for teaching English based on the topic.


TEACHERS' COLLABORATIVE CORNER (TCC)

TCC is divided into three main sections: TALK ABOUT IT, COMPARE/CONTRAST, and CONTRIBUTE. It provides an avenue for teachers around the globe to share their knowledge, and research, and show how their reality is similar or different from other countries; taking as base the topic under discussion. It also gives them the opportunity to freely share their daily classroom practices for others to benefit from them.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Special gratitude to teacher Neil Arévalo Alcántara from PERU for his participation as a GUEST SPEAKER during the twelfth episode of the IELTA Teachers´ Forum in Zoom and Facebook Live.


DEDICATORY

This publication of the Teachers Forum is dedicated to all teachers in the world who work hard to innovate and are the part of a positive change in regards of the educational field.



ON THE COVER

It is the WINNER IMAGE of THE PICTURE OPEN HOUSE CONTEST held by IELTA Research Development Department, 2023.

Credits: Zeboniso Muradova, English teacher at Bokhtar State University and the English Resource Center Teachers, Tajikistan.

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

INSIDE TOPIC

Unlocking Potential: Reading for Success

Yuliana I. Vásquez G. - Panama

ITFIJ Editor in Chief

In this publication of the IELTA Teachers Forum Insights Journal, the editorial team wants to shine a light on the profound impact of reading. It's not just about acquiring literacy skills; it's the cornerstone of academic achievement, personal growth, and a fulfilling life. As educators, we witness the magic firsthand. A child engrossed in a captivating story, their imagination soaring. A teenager grappling with complex ideas in a non-fiction book, their critical thinking muscles flexing.

These moments highlight the transformative power of reading. Research reinforces this magic. Studies consistently link strong reading skills to academic success across all subjects. Proficient readers grasp information more readily, build a richer vocabulary, and develop stronger communication skills. They become critical thinkers, able to analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information.

However, the benefits extend far beyond the classroom. Reading exposes us to diverse perspectives, fostering empathy and understanding. It fuels creativity, ignites a love for lifelong learning, and provides a powerful tool for navigating an information-rich world.

So, how can a teacher cultivate a love for reading in students? It consulted some literature, teachers´ ideas, and even AI suggestions. Based on the provided information, here are a few ideas:

  • Create a print-rich environment: Surround students with books that cater to a variety of interests and reading levels. Make classroom libraries inviting and well-organized.
  • Read aloud daily: Model the joy of reading by selecting captivating stories and poems. Encourage active listening through discussions and predictions.
  • Independent reading time: Dedicate time for students to explore books of their choice. Let them lose themselves in the narrative and celebrate their selections.
  • Genre exploration: Introduce students to a variety of genres – fiction, non-fiction, biographies – to spark curiosity and broaden their literary horizons.
  • Reading activities: Go beyond comprehension questions. Encourage creative responses through book reports, reader's theaters, or artistic interpretations.
  • Connect reading to life: Help students see how reading applies to their world. Discuss real-world applications of concepts encountered in books.
  • Community involvement: Partner with libraries, bookstores, or authors for guest speakers or book club sessions.
  • Technology integration: Utilize educational apps and audiobooks to cater to different learning styles and make reading accessible.

To conclude, by fostering a love for reading, it is necessary to equip our students with the tools they need to not only succeed in school but also to thrive in life. Let's turn every classroom into a springboard for lifelong learning adventures!


_Yuliana V.






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

INSIDE TOPIC

Reading: The Key to Success, Better Life and Educational Outcomes

Neil Edwin Arevalo Alcantara - Perú

ITFIJ Guest Speaker

Reading is the main source to get ideas, strategies to face problems, and knowledge to succeed in life, when we read magazines, newspapers, books, articles, and others, we can have some answers to the following questions: what happened in the past? what is happening now? And what will happen in the future? Therefore, our decisions will be more precise and efficient but to get these essential skills, it is necessary to develop some reading strategies to comprehend everything we read. UNICEF in 2022 said that only a third of 10-year-olds globally are estimated to be able to read and understand a simple written story. UNICEF warns of the global education crisis and the need for urgent actions as world leaders gather at the Transforming Education Summit in New York during the UN General Assembly. One solution to face this issue is to be critical readers.

Critical reading involves actively reading the text to understand the author’s viewpoints. Rather than blindly accepting what is stated in the text, you should examine and question assumptions in research papers and bring in your own experience and expertise to develop new ideas and fresh perspectives. It can also help you build strong theoretical foundations and improve the quality of your academic work. Honing your critical reading skills allows you to easily assess evidence and integrate this information into your daily life.

Here we will discuss nine critical reading strategies that will help you become an effective reader acording to George (2023):

Read with purpose: Critical reading is all about focus! Come prepared with a question you want answered. Skim the paper, highlighting key parts that address your specific need. This lets you decide if the whole paper is relevant, saving you valuable time. As you get better at this, you'll become a critical reading whiz, quickly spotting the gold nuggets in any research. Bonus: You'll also learn how top-notch papers are structured, a skill you can use to write your impactful work!

Take down notes: Don't just passively read scholarly articles – dissect them! Underline key points, jot down your thoughts, and question anything unclear. This active reading approach helps you truly grasp the meaning and build strong arguments later. Highlighting the important bits lets you revisit them easily, saving valuable time in the long run.

Read without biases: Critical reading isn't about blind acceptance. You'll encounter ideas that resonate with you, and others that challenge your beliefs. The key is to check your emotions at the door! Approach the research objectively, understanding the author's arguments is crucial, even if you disagree. This allows you to accurately reference their work in your writing.

Put things in context: Critical reading goes beyond the words on the page. Researchers need to consider the bigger picture – the social, cultural, and historical context that shaped the research. Understanding the "when" and "where" of the research helps you interpret its meaning and build stronger arguments based on your current reality.

Look for connections: Critical reading isn't just about the text in front of you. It's about building bridges! By searching for connections to past readings in your field, you can weave existing knowledge into a stronger tapestry of ideas. This not only clarifies how your work fits into the bigger picture but also broadens your






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

INSIDE TOPIC

understanding with a global perspective. You might even connect with the authors of these related sources - another avenue to deepen your learning!

Read multiple times: Don't be discouraged if you need to read a research paper more than once! Focus and multiple readings unlock deeper layers of understanding. You'll catch connections you might have missed at first. Just like writing, mastering critical reading takes practice. The more you do it, the better you'll become at dissecting research.

Maintain a journal: Critical reading isn't just about absorbing information. This step involves actively capturing key points, interesting stories, references, and where the author agrees or disagrees with others. Don't be shy about writing down any questions that pop up too! This journal becomes your personal research treasure chest - not only a handy study guide but also a goldmine for sparking new research ideas down the road.

Paraphrase and simplify: Critical reading tackles tough scientific concepts, but sometimes even that isn't enough. Paraphrasing the text is a powerful tool! By rephrasing the ideas in your own words, you can unlock a deeper understanding of the research paper. This not only clarifies the content but also hones your academic writing skills in the process.

Build your vocabulary: Reading scientific research can be a treasure trove of new vocabulary! Taking note of unfamiliar terms and how they're used will not only speed up your reading in the long run, but also give you a richer toolbox of words to use in your writing.

Following these critical reading strategies can help you read more effectively and build a repository of great ideas. Your learnings from and interpretations of previously published work can then be translated into potentially ground-breaking research that will put you on the path to success.




Reference


George, E. (2023). 9 Critical Reading Strategies and How it can Improve Your Writing.

https://researcher.life/blog/article/9-critical-reading-strategies-and-how-it-can-improve-your-writing/

.








ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Effective Methods to Teach Reading in English to 5-7 Year Old’s Kids, Penonome, 2023

Yariadna Rodríguez; Angie Rojas; María Saavedra - Panama

Abstract

Teaching reading for kids, especially 5-7-years old, is a critical task that requires effective methods to ensure comprehension and retention. These methods focus on experience, interactivity, communication, use of authentic materials, and proper structuring of lessons. By combining these approaches, teachers can create a stimulating and effective learning environment for children. This study investigates the most effective methods for teaching English reading to children of this age. It was carried out by interviewing teachers from different schools in Penonomé, both public and private, through platforms such as ZOOM and Google Meet; in which many teaching approaches and methods were analyzed. The results reveal that combining methods such as teaching phonics and word repetition are the most effective methods to promote reading skills in kids. In addition, various technological tools, such as educational apps, interactive e-books, and online reading programs, can provide children at this age with effective learning experiences. In addition, technology facilitates the development of phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills. These results provide valuable information for educators seeking to improve the teaching of reading to children 5 -7 years old.


Keywords: Teachers, English learners, kids, levels, reading.


Introduction

When students move on to the first and second levels of elementary schools, they are expected to know how to read or have a good reading balance. However, when they reach these levels, most students do not achieve it in Spanish, making it more complex to read in English. The Estrella de Panamá (2022) highlights that “in Panama, according to UNESCO, in terms of educational quality, five out of ten children in third level do not achieve the minimum grade in reading, and this figure increases to almost nine out of ten in the comarcas (Crecer 2017 tests)” (para. 8). Educators and parents face the challenge of selecting appropriate strategies that address the diverse learning needs of children within this age group. However, there is growing concern about variability in children's reading achievement. It is vital to highlight that children above ten must learn to read; on the contrary, they will face many struggles in their learning process.

Teaching reading to 5- to 7-year-olds requires engaging and interactive methods adapted to their developmental stage, such as introducing phonics early by teaching letter-sound correlations or incorporating games and activities that make learning fun. Examples include word bingo, scavenger hunts for words, and interactive word-building games linked to technology.

The aforementioned facts take the researchers to know what the most effective methods are to teach reading in English to 5-7-year-old kids in light of elementary school teachers in Penonomé.


Theoretical Framework

Teaching young children to read is a crucial task that requires effective methods to ensure successful literacy development. This literature review examines methods for teaching English reading to children ages 5 to 7, focusing on efficient approaches to improving reading skills and fostering a love of reading. Teaching a



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

child to read begins at birth with the reinforcement of pre-literacy skills. “One of the most common ways to teach reading is via the sounding out method, in which kids are encouraged to read aloud, pronouncing each letter or group of letters until they recognize the word by sound” (Cicerchia, n.d., para 4).

According to some other authors, there are several methods and strategies for teaching kids to read in English.

Phonics

Phonics instruction is an outstanding component of teaching reading in English to kids. It focuses on teaching the relationship between letters (graphemes) and sounds (phonemes) in English. "Phonics is the relationship between letters and sounds in a language. Children need phonics to decode words in reading and encode words in spelling" (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000).

Ample Exposure and Repetition

Ample exposure to print and repetition of reading materials is essential for young learners to develop strong reading skills. They help children build vocabulary, develop fluency, and gain confidence in their reading abilities. Ample exposure and repetition not only enhance reading skills. It also builds confidence in young learners. As children become more familiar with words and texts, they gain confidence in their reading abilities. “Reading words that contain the same letters and letter combinations and seeing those words multiple times helps kids practice early reading skills. Did you know that 50-75% of the words in most children’s books come from the Dolch list?” (Cicerchia, n.d., para 16).

Sight Word

Sight Word recognition involves teaching students to recognize high-frequency words by sight without sounding them out phonetically. According to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000), "Teaching children to recognize words by sight enhances their reading fluency and comprehension, particularly for common words that do not follow regular phonetic patterns". This method allows students to recognize high-frequency words quickly while developing their ability to decode unfamiliar words phonetically.

In short, effective methods for teaching reading to kids should be comprehensive, engaging, and tailored to individual learning needs. By combining phonics instruction, sight word recognition, exposure to print, repetition, and a diversity of reading materials, educators can help young learners develop strong reading skills and a lifelong love of reading. Additionally, exposure to print-rich environments and repeated practice with reading materials are critical for reinforcing learning and building confidence in young readers.

Methodology

Population and Sample Description

The chosen group for this research was five female and one male English teacher from different schools in Penonomé, Coclé province, Panamá, with between five and twenty years of experience in the teaching field in public and private schools working with levels from kindergarten to second grade. Purposive snowball sampling was the procedure used to collect the information where the participants shared what methods they considered the most effective in teaching reading in English. “Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling method where new units are recruited by other units to form part of the sample” (Nikolopoulou, 2022). Three of those teachers were contacted by WhatsApp as known professionals, and three were recommended by teachers of the sample group.

Instrument

Easwaramoorthy & Zarinpoush (2006) stated, “An interview is a conversation for gathering information. A research interview involves an interviewer, who coordinates the process of the conversation and asks questions, and an interviewee, who responds to those questions.” To collect the information, an interview in questionnaire format was elaborated, with twelve open questions based on the indicators: most effective



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

methods to teach reading to 5 to 7-year-old kids, adaptation to learning styles, challenges, perception of effectiveness, and technological sources to teach reading. The interview was conducted individually in an online semi-structured interview to collect data. It was performed individually because the researchers' idea was to obtain separate information to contrast the data and find similarities at the end, so they cannot conclude the same but have their own opinions. The interview questions were the following:

1. Do you work in a particular or public elementary school?

2. Level you work with

3. Years of expertise as a teacher

4. What are the most effective methods for teaching reading in English according to your experience? Mention them.

5. May you choose one of them and share why you consider this method the most effective?

6. How do you apply this method in the classroom?

7. How do you perceive the children feel when they learn in this way?

8. How do you adapt your teaching methods for reading to different learning styles and student needs?

9. How do you encourage reading in English for your students?

10. Is technology useful in teaching reading in English to 5-7-years-old children? Why?

Yes,

No

11. What could be some technological resources or educational apps that can be useful in teaching reading to children at this stage?

12. What are some of the biggest challenges of teaching reading in English, and how do you overcome them?

Procedure

A questionnaire of twelve questions was elaborated in Google Documents, and the individual online interviews were conducted via Google Meet and Zoom platforms. The interviewed participants were contacted through WhatsApp. The interviews were conducted from February 26th to March 4th, 2024. In the interview, the researchers and the teacher met. One researcher informed the participant about the purpose of the interview, gave a little introduction, and asked for recording permission. The second and third researchers asked the questions. When the teacher participant did not answer the question completely, the researcher asked for more details politely. At the same time, few questions emerged during the interviews, but it was to gather more information and obtain a better description of the teacher participant experience. Teachers answered all the questions and expanded their personal experiences by providing extra relevant information. Finally, the researchers thanked the participants and let them know the final data would be shared with them for their development as English teachers.

Limitations

The information collected was limited to a small sample of 6 teachers, although at least 10 participants were expected to participate. Some of the teachers contacted had confirmed their participation, but at the last time, they did not answer anymore. Another limitation was that 2 of the six teachers preferred not to be recorded, which limited the data analysis because all the meetings were planned to be recorded and done via Google Meet and Zoom platforms; however, it was resolved by taking notes of the interview.

Findings

In this section, the answer to each question is analyzed.

According to the first question, “Do you work in a particular or public elementary school?” 2 participants work in public elementary schools, and 4 in private schools. It helps the researchers to analyze the diversity of methods used on both sides.

According to the second question, “Level you work with” 5 participants worked with second-level students and 1 with first-level students. It can be helpful to support the variability of teaching methods in



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

different stages.

According to the third question, “Years of expertise as a teacher”, the participants had between 5 to 20 years of expertise. The years of expertise play a significant role in describing the number of methods used and how you have adapted them over time.

According to the fourth question,What are the most effective methods for teaching reading in English according to your experience? Mention them” the participants answered:

Table 1

Most Effective Methods for Teaching Reading in English
















It could be appreciated that the most repeated and effective method was Phonics.

According to the fifth question, “May you choose one of them and share why you consider this method the most effective?” For most teachers, the most effective method to teach reading in English is Phonics. In their opinion, Phonics is one of the best methods to help students in reading because they must learn how to pronounce words correctly. They also mention that using repetition while teaching the pronunciation of words in vocabulary acquisition is effective. For that, it is possible to conclude that Phonics and Repetition work better for the kids.

According to the sixth question, “How do you apply this method in the classroom?” there were multiple answers, and the most repeated or similar were the following: Teachers combine phonics and repetition to improve the pronunciation of phonemes. Also, they use a list of words and explain how they are pronounced. For example, when a word starts with the letter ‘a’, there are many ways to pronounce the phoneme: airplane - /ˈɛrˌpleɪn/, apple - /ˈæpəl/, art - /ɑrt/, and for kids’ memorization they work with repetition. Another application participants mention is that they show a word with its illustration, then pronounce the word to the kids and ask them to repeat it in chorus. Usually, they start reading short words to facilitate memorization in kids. The participants explained when kids associate a word with a picture, it is easier for them to memorize and pronounce it correctly. These methods should be put into practice since they intensify the development of pre-reading skills, which are important to have a good command of reading in English.

According to the seventh question, “How do you perceive the children feel when they learn in this way?” The participants mentioned children feel motivated, comfortable, excited, and happy. One aspect mentioned was about the influence of the teacher's mood and her body language influenced the kid’s feelings. The atmosphere in the classroom, created by the teacher's actions, will undoubtedly affect the students' learning.

According to the eighth question, “How do you adapt your teaching methods for reading to different learning styles and student needs?” Some of the most mentioned strategies were extra explanation individually, using




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

real objects instead of pictures for a better understanding, implementing activities with games, applying collaborative learning, and making use of pictures and posters to illustrate words. In short, an excellent teaching methodology allows to establish and adapt appropriate activities for each student stage. Thus, children experience different logical sequences, created specifically for their level of learning.

According to the ninth question, “How do you encourage reading in English for your students? Most of the participants made a “Reading Corner” in the classroom where kids can find a variety of books with different topics where they can find the ones of their interest. Encouraging reading from childhood creates a positive educational process since reading a book helps the student improve his vocabulary and develop a critical analysis, which promotes self-confidence when expressing himself.

According to the tenth question, “Is technology useful in teaching reading in English to 5-7-years-old children? Why?" All the participants answered that technology is useful in teaching reading to improve listening and pronunciation skills. However, according to teachers' comments, public schools do not have the equipment to develop the different activities. On the other hand, private schools count on the devices, but teachers must be careful with how they apply technology because kids can be distracted and not pay attention. Technology has arrived to innovate in education by promoting interactive activities, providing students with benefits and skills development, and making the learning process more attractive, fun, and effective.

According to the eleventh question, “What could be some technological resources or educational apps that can be useful in teaching reading to children at this stage?” Some technological resources used by the participants are YouTube, Netflix Kids, YouTube Kids, and Unsocialized.net free website. This demonstrates the variety of technological resources that can be combined with the methods of teaching reading in English.

According to the twelfth question, “What are some of the biggest challenges of teaching reading in English, and how do you overcome them?” the participants' comments were almost the same. They mentioned that the biggest challenge in teaching reading is that students do not want to participate since kids do not want to make mistakes and be mocked by their peers. Besides, kids in reading do not speak aloud, which makes it complicated to correct them. They overcome that situation by asking questions to the students and making classes more interactive and creative. Another participants’ challenge is that some students do not know how to read in Spanish, their mother tongue, which makes teaching reading in English difficult. They emphasize that in that situation, the key is repetition to help kids memorize and acquire vocabulary. The last challenge for the participants is that not all the students are at the same level. Some of them understand well but do not have good pronunciation. Others pronounce it well but do not understand it, making teaching reading a little complex. However, the teachers overcome this obstacle using collaborative learning. In summary, these comments show that there are many challenges in teaching reading in English and this is present in both public and private education.

Conclusion

Reading is the basis of the construction of knowledge. For that, the main objective of this research was to identify the most effective methods to teach reading in English to 5- to 7-year-old children in Penonomé. It was focused on the early stage of students because kids need an appropriate basis in reading to have a good development and learning process in the following years of education.

Through this research, it was possible to find that the most effective methods of teaching reading in English, according to the participants' experiences, are Phonics and Repetition. Phonics is a method characterized by the study of letters and sounds. It is vital in reading because students can learn how to read and pronounce correctly from the beginning with this method; moreover, repetition is another method frequently employed by teachers. This method allows to retain the information, and according to teachers' comments, it is mainly helpful in vocabulary acquisition.

However, those methods were not the only ones mentioned; the use of pictionaries, flashcards, short stories, games, videos, sight words, vowels and consonants, and mixed strategies were also applied to teaching reading

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

by the participants. Teaching reading aims for kids to enjoy and promote this habit for the use of diverse techniques and methods, as previously mentioned, is necessary.

Another aspect mentioned by the participants was the use of technology. For the participants working at private schools, it can help teach reading, but they need to be aware of kids to avoid distraction. However, for the participants who teach in public elementary schools, the application of technology in their classrooms is complex due to insufficient resources and devices despite mentioning it is a great tool for them.

As this research demonstrates, there is no single method for teaching children to read in English. Many factors influence the teaching process; however, there can always be a tool for every need.


References


Cicerchia, M. (n.d.). Teaching children to read. Retrieved from www.readandspell.com:

https://www.readandspell.com/teaching-children-toread#:~:text=Nonetheless%2C%20most%20kids%

20will%20officially,recognize%20the%20word%20by%20sound

Easwaramoorthy, M., & Zarinpoush, F. (2006). Interviewing for Research. Retrieved from sectorsource.ca:

https://sectorsource.ca/sites/default/files/resources/files/tipsheet6_interviewing_for_research_en_0.pdf

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000, April). Teaching

Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its

Implications for Reading Instruction. Retrieved from www.nichd.nih.gov:

https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf

Nikolopoulou, K. (2022, August 17). What Is Snowball Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Retrieved from

www.scribbr.com: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/snowball-sampling/

N’Namdi, K. A. (2005). Guide to Teaching Reading at the Primary School Level. Retrieved from

files.eric.ed.gov: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495644.pdf

Oliveros, V. (2022, November). Incidencia del uso de las Sight Words como una estrategia didáctica para

favorecer. Retrieved from repositorio.uceva.edu.co:

https://repositorio.uceva.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12993/3772/Sight_Words_Estrategia_Didactica.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Rojas, K. (2022, April 2). 'Es definitivo que hay una deficiencia en los aprendizajes', dice Moreno. Retrieved

from Laestrella.com: https://www.laestrella.com.pa/vida-y-cultura/cultura/definitivo-hay-deficiencia-

aprendizajes-dice-ALLE467698

Russak, S., & Wong, R. (2019, February 1). How phonics can give children a head start with reading English.

Retrieved from www.britishcouncil.org: https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/how-phonics-

can-give-children-head-start-reading-english

Smith, F. (1997). PARA DARLE SENTIDO A LA LECTURA. Retrieved from dokumen.tips:

https://dokumen.tips/documents/smith-frank-para-darle-sentido-a-la-lectura.html

Valdivieso, L. B., Villalón, M., & Orellana, E. (2004). The cognitive processes and the learning of initial

reading:Cognitive differences between good and defficient readers. Retrieved from www.scielo.cl:

https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-07052004000100001








ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Oral and Silent Reading Strategies on the Level of Reading Comprehension of Grade 7 Students

Alcantara, Aliah Krizzel A., Calcetas, Jasmine Joy B., Canino, Angeline Grace B. Gonzaga, Claire Ann B., Hernandez, Jhanna Grace Dyan S., Reyes, Jovelle M., Zulueta, Jannelle G. - Philippines

Abstract

Reading comprehension is the ability to understand what is being read. However, most students can read and pronounce words correctly but are unable to explain what they mean because of a lack of comprehension. Silent reading and oral reading are two reading strategies used by teachers to help students improve their reading and comprehension skills. According to DepEd Region IV-A Director Francis Cesar B. Bringas, there has been a continuous decrease in the passing rate of all students, including CALABARZON learners, in the said examinations from 2016 to 2018. Therefore, determining the best reading strategy can increase the number of students who can comprehend the texts they read.

This study used modified printed reading materials for the seventh grade from the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI). This descriptive research precisely and methodically determined which reading strategy, oral reading or silent reading, is better at increasing student's reading comprehension. Forty (40) Grade 7 Students from Banca-Banca Integrated National High School who were randomly selected regardless of their class standing are the respondents to this study. The results indicated that between the two reading strategies, silent reading was better than oral reading since it demonstrated higher levels of reading comprehension.

Based on the findings, it is recommended by the researchers to use the silent reading strategy to help students increase their reading comprehension at the literal, inferential, and evaluative levels.


Keywords: Oral reading, silent reading, reading comprehension


Introduction

Reading is an important factor in improving general English language skills. There are two ways for learners to read: oral reading and silent reading. Oral reading is the translation of written or printed text into speech. On the other hand, silent reading is a situation in which a student does not read aloud. Instead, he/she quietly reads to himself. Meanwhile, reading and comprehension are two interconnected skills. For students to derive meaning from the information they have read; they must improve their reading comprehension skills.

Given the significance of reading and comprehension, educators have been called upon to ensure that assistance is provided to children to help them develop fluency in reading. The Department of Education Region IV-A (DepEd) indicated students' struggle with reading comprehension as a factor in their performance on the National Achievement Test and the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy Program. Furthermore, according to DepEd Region IV-A Director Francis Cesar B. Bringas, there has been a continuous decrease in the passing rate of all students, including CALABARZON learners, in the said examinations from 2016 to 2018.





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Meanwhile, the Department of Education (DepEd) supports Every Child a Reader Program, which strives to make every Filipino child a reader as well as a writer at his or her grade level. The Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI), utilized as a classroom-based assessment tool, is intended to assess and characterize learners' reading performance in oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension in both English and Filipino.

Hence, the goal of this study is to investigate and provide crucial information on Grade 7 students’ level of reading comprehension to ascertain its main objectives.

Objectives of the Study

This study aims to:

(1) Identify the level of oral and silent reading comprehension of grade 7 students of Banca-Banca Integrated National High School.

(2) Evaluate which reading strategy is better in raising the level of comprehension of grade 7 students of Banca-Banca Integrated National High School.

(3) Determine if there is a significant difference between oral reading comprehension and silent reading comprehension of the grade 7 students at Banca-Banca Integrated National High School.

Methodology

Design

This study used descriptive research methodology. Forty (40) grade 7 students have read orally and silently as part of the comparative analysis. The students were engaged in oral reading as their first reading activity, which was followed by a 15-item test that was given by the researchers to assess the student's level of oral reading comprehension. Afterward, the students were engaged in the silent reading activity, and the researchers then administered a 15-item test to assess the student's level of comprehension through silent reading.

Participants

The participants of this study were involved in three sections of Filipino students enrolled as grade 7 students in Banca-Banca Integrated National High School during the academic year 2022-2023. A total of forty (40) 7th-grade students participated in this study. The respondents were chosen randomly, regardless of their class standing.

Data Collection and Analysis

The researchers looked for suitable and relevant reading materials from the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) for the 7th-grade students of Banca-Banca Integrated National High School to appropriately and correctly measure their reading comprehension. The next step was to prepare an approval sheet that was signed by the Principal of Banca Integrated National High School to allow the researchers to research the school involving its students.

As soon as the letter of permission was signed, the researchers started the data-gathering process. On the first day, the students read the passage orally three times before taking a 15-item test with five evaluative, five inferential, and five literal questions. After that, the students proceeded with their silent reading activity. A different passage was given to them, and after three times of reading, a 15-item test with five evaluative, five inferential, and five literal questions were administered by the researchers.

On the second and last day, the same respondents read the different passages three times for their oral and silent reading activities; following that, a 15-item test was answered by the students.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the level of reading comprehension in terms of Oral Reading. Day 1 has a mean level of 8.95 with a standard deviation of 1.79 and is rated as “Moderate”. Day 2 has a mean level of 9.07 with a standard deviation of 1.75 and is rated as “Moderate”. Day 3 has a mean level of 9.20 with a standard deviation of 1.34 and is rated as “Moderate”. Overall, oral reading has a mean level of 9.08 with a standard deviation 1.62 and







ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

rated as “Moderate”.

Oral reading had to be done eloquently accompanied by expressive looks, proper intonation, and emotions. To maximize the use of reading instruction in classrooms, schools began to use oral reading that focuses on articulation, pronunciation, and delivery that’s why it was viewed as the better approach in reading instruction. Oral reading is an important learning strategy to improve the level of students’ reading comprehension abilities. A crucial role that may support them in dealing with text-level difficulties in the learning materials. Students indicated that oral reading has helped them to enhance their reading proficiency, comprehend higher-level texts, and develop their reading comprehension skills.

Table 1

Level of reading comprehension in terms of Oral Reading











Table 2 shows the level of reading comprehension in terms of silent reading. Day 1 has a mean level of 9.67 with a standard deviation of 1.70 and is rated as “High”. Day 2 has a mean level of 10.51 with a standard deviation of 1.25 and is rated as “High”. Day 3 has a mean level of 10.42 with a standard deviation of 1.28 and is rated as “High”. Overall, oral reading has a mean level of 10.20 with a standard deviation of 1.47 and rated as “High”.

Silent reading does not require using vocal cords or worrying about saying the words with thrust or pronouncing them correctly. It lets you read words any way you want to, which proves to be a more effective way that help you build momentum and grasp important information. It helps students to focus on what is written in the text instead of worrying about the correct pronunciation of words. It also helps improve reading comprehension in countless ways.


Table 2

Level of reading comprehension in terms of Silent Reading





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Table 3 shows the difference between the level of oral and silent reading comprehension. The degree of freedom is 238. The computed t- value is – 5.58 and the computed p – value is <0.00001. It means that the difference between the level of oral and silent reading comprehension is significant.

The difference proves that though the students demonstrate comprehension in either of the two strategies, students demonstrate comprehension better using silent reading.


Table 3

Difference between the level of oral and silent reading comprehension









Conclusion

The results suggest that silent reading is better than oral reading in terms of reading comprehension since it had a higher rate based on the performance of the students. In silent reading, the students were given enough time to focus on what they read and understand its content. Students involved in silent reading exhibited better focus and better comprehension.

Based on the results and the conclusion above, researchers recommend the following actions for the beneficiaries of the study;

1. The researchers recommend teachers use the silent reading strategy to enhance the students' literal, inferential, and evaluative levels of reading comprehension.

2. The researchers recommend students practice the silent reading strategy to improve their reading comprehension at the literal, inferential, and evaluative levels.

3. The researchers recommend further studies using the silent reading strategy in assessing the levels of reading comprehension: literal, inferential, and evaluative. Furthermore, they have to make sure that the questions are properly and appropriately formulated.



References


Alatalo, T. & Westlund, B. (2021). Preschool teachers’ perceptions about read-alouds as a means to support

children’s early literacy and language development. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy.

https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1302852/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Anderson, E. (2021). 5 Benefits of Reading Aloud in Your Classroom. Carnegie Learning. Retrieved December

20, 2022, from https://www.carnegielearning.com/5-benefits-reading-aloud/

Anuradha. (2022, January 8). What is the Difference Between Loud Reading and Silent Reading - Pediaa.Com.

Pediaa.Com. Retrieved December 2, 2022, from https://pediaa.com/what-is-the-difference-between-loud-

reading-and-silent-reading/

Augusto, W. (2022, April 11). Correlation Of Students’ Level of Reading Comprehension in Filipino Language

and Self-Esteem. Retrieved May 30, 2023, from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/345-

359_William+Augusto%20(2).pdf















ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Baker, D. L., et al. (2020, June 6). Effects of a Read Aloud Intervention on First Grade Student Vocabulary,

Listening Comprehension, and Language Proficiency. Springer Link.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11145-020-10060-2

Billah, M. (2015, July 17). Significance of Silent Reading. Significance of Silent Reading |

theindependentbd.com. Retrieved December 2, 2022, from

https://www.theindependentbd.com/magazine/details/8098/Significance-of-Silent-Reading

Bouchrika, I. (2022, September 26). What is Information Processing Theory? Stages, Models & Limitations.

Research.com. Retrieved December 2, 2022, from https://research.com/education/what-is-information-

processing-theory

Briones, & Janer. (2023). Reading Comprehension Skills and The Level of Performance of Grade 7 Students in

Chemistry. Retrieved June 4, 2023, from https://uijrt.com/articles/v4/i3/UIJRTV4I30013.pdf

Caraig, R., & Quimbo, M. A. (2022, September 1). Assessing Reading Comprehension Difficulties in Core

Science Subjects of Senior High School Students in a Private School in Calamba City, Philippines |

International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction.

https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1072

Carretero, & Espiel. (2020). Factors Affecting the Reading Comprehension of Grade 7 Students. Retrieved May

30, 2023, from https://uijrt.com/articles/v3/i9/UIJRTV3I90001.pdf

DaCosta, & Gutierrez. (2020). Level of Reading Comprehension of Dominican EFL College Students. Retrieved

June 4, 2023, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED602358.pdf

Department of Education. (2018). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory Manual.

https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/03DO_s2018_014.pdf

DiSalle, K. & Rasinski, T. (2020). Impact of short-term intense fluency instructions on students’ reading

achievement: a classroom-based, teacher-initiated research study. Journal of Teacher Action Research. http://www.practicalteacherresearch.com/uploads/5/6/2/4/56249715/impact_of_short_term_intense_fluency_instruction_on_students%E2%80%99_reading_achievement-_a_classroom-based_teacher-initiated_research_study.pdf

Ditona, G., & Rico, F. (2021). Reading Level of Grade II Pupils Scaffolding for Reading Program of Eastern

Schools in Botolan District, Philippines. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research.

Fumagalli, Barreyro, & Jaichenco. (2019). Reading Fluency Differences between Oral and Silent Reading

Comprehension. Global Journal of Human-Social Science. Retrieved

fromhttps://socialscienceresearch.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/view/3024

García-Rodicio, H., Melero, M.-Á., & Izquierdo, M.-B. (2018). A comparison of reading aloud, silent reading and

follower reading. Which is best for comprehension? Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of

Education and Development. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02103702.201.1364038

Gajowski, C. (2019, December 29). Why silent reading doesn’t work for struggling readers. Scientific Learning.

https://www.scilearn.com/why-silent-reading-doesnt-work-struggling-readers/

Gehlot, L., Al-Khalaf, H. A., & Gehlot, H. (2020, February). Evaluation of the Reading Habits of Indian Students

(Reading Aloud and Reading Silently) from Low, Middle and High Class Schools.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1242187.pdf

Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Williams, J., Hawkins, R., Neddenriep, C. E., & Dizer, J. (n.d.). Comparing

Comprehension Following Silent and Aloud Reading across Elementary and Secondary Students:

Implication for Curriculum-Based Measurement. The Behavior Analyst Today.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ800965.pdf/

Hernandez, C. (n.d.). Reading Comprehension Level and Vocabulary Skills of Grade 2 Pupils and Their

Academic Performance in English of St. Paul University Philippines. Retrieved May 30, 2023, from

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/404-Article%20Text-508-1-10-20210303.pdf


















ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Hiebert, E., & Daniel, M. (2019, September). Comprehension and rate during silent reading: Why do some

students do poorly? Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329426237_Comprehension_and_rate_during_silent_reading_Why_do_some_students_do_poorly

Kemaloglu, E. (n.d.). The effects of teacher’s Psyridou, M., Tolvanen, A., Niemi, P., Lerkkanen, M., Poikkeus, A.,

& Torppa, M. (2022). Development of silent reading fluency and reading comprehension across grades 1 to

9: unidirectional or bidirectional effects between the two skills? Reading and Writing.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10371-6

reading aloud versus students’ silent reading on surface and deep level comprehension: A quasi-experimental

study from a tertiary context. DergiPark. Retrieved November 23, 2022, from

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/877600

Khotimah, K. (2020). Engaging Students In 15-Minute Silent Reading in English Class: Students’ Perceived

Benefits. https://doi.org/10.18860/abj.v5i2.11022

Marquez, M. C. (2019, January 18). Reading Aloud and Silent Reading: A Comparative Analysis of the Use of

Two Reading Strategies on Reading Comprehension.

https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/9106

Miñoza, M., & Montero, M. (2019). Reading Comprehension Level Among Intermediate Learners. Retrieved

November 23, 2022, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED596833.pdf

Morrison, T. G. & Wilcox, B. (2020, March 4). Assessing Expressive Oral Reading Fluency. MDPI.

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/3/59

Nabor, L. G., & Cruz, R. a. O. (2022). Project 555: A silent reading intervention towards an improved reading

comprehension in English. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v7i2.1805

Nadirah, N., Asrifan, A., Vargheese, K. J., Haedar. (2020, August). Interactive Multimedia in EFL Classroom: A

Study of Teaching Reading Comprehension at Junior High School in Indonesia. Journal of Advanced

English Studies. https://jaes.journal.unifa.ac.id/index.php/jes/article/download/92/48

Pergams, O. R., Jake-Matthews, C. E., & Mohanty, L. M. (2018). A Combined Read-Aloud Think-Aloud Strategy

Improves Student Learning Experiences in College-Level. Journal of College Science Teaching.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324923715_A_Combined_Read-Aloud_Think-

Aloud_Strategy_Improves_Student_Learning_Experiences_in_College-Level_Biology_Courses

Santi, E., Kholipa, R., Putri, M., & Mujiono. (2021, June 20). Reading interest strength and vocabulary

acquisition of EFL learners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. Retrieved

November 23, 2022, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1324657.pdf

Suson, R., Baratbate, C., Anoos, W., & Ermac, E. (2020, September). Basic Reading Comprehension in

Philippine Settings. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344965850_Basic_Reading_Comprehension_in_Philippine_Settings

Ülper, H., Çetinkaya, G., & Dikici, A. (2018). Examination of Factors Affecting Students’ Reading-

Comprehension Achievement with Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of Assessment

Tools in Education. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.404205

University of Eastern Philippines. Reading Comprehension Levels and Academic Performance Research Paper.

(2020). https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/university-of-eastern-philippines/bs-

accountancy/reading-comprehension-levels-and-academic-performance-research-paper/33930556

Vasay, M. J., Bilbao, M. E., & Donguila, C. L. (2018). Level of Reading Comprehension of the Education

Students. Philippine EJournals| Level of Reading Comprehension of the Education Students.

https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=13762









ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Yoneoka, J. (n.d.) Choral Reading vs. Individual Oral and Silent Reading: Relative Validity of the Alternatives in

the English Reading Classroom. http://www2.kumagaku.ac.jp/teacher/~judy/gyoseki/09/09.doc

Zainab, R., & Abu-Ayyash (2021). Oral Reading Fluency: Teaching and Assessment Strategies. Universal

Journal of Educational Research.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837783_Oral_Reading_Fluency_Teaching_and_Assessment_Strategies









ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Refining English Sophomore Students´ Communicative Skills through Inferential Reading at Centro Regional Universitario de Coclé, 2024.

María Fernández; Wendy Flores; Naomi Herrera - Panama

Abstract

Inferential reading implies extracting information that is not explicitly stated in a text. This type of reading could or could not refine communicative skills due to the connections they create to establish a statement for any conversation. To revise how inferential reading refines English Sophomore Communicative Skills, mixed descriptive research was conducted on 20 students from the English School at Centro Regional Universitario de Coclé. The results suggest most students believe inferential reading refines communicative skills and also improves reading comprehension and critical thinking. However, a percentage of 5,3% do not consider it contributes to their communication skills improvement.


Keywords: Inferential reading, communication skills, reading comprehension, critical thinking, improvement.


Introduction

Undergraduates must convey their ideas professionally, this implies that they are constantly practicing their verbal abilities. Thus, they should be the ones who mostly read books and social impact magazines, as it improves their critical thinking for their intellectual activities and academic performance development. (Nuñez, 2018) . Unfortunately, many struggle to express themselves fluently because of their lack of practice at reading. According to Southern Oregon University (2023), when students lack this essential literacy skill, they can face trouble communicating in daily life, demonstrate difficulty in school, have problems finding a job, inequality, and accessing health care. In this context, inferential reading could generate different skills students may need to develop. Approaching research like this might benefit English Sophomore Students at Centro Regional Universitario de Coclé so that they could successfully face communicative challenges in their academic and professional future.


Theoretical Framework

In higher education, students perform oral presentations delivered as story-telling, round tables, time-limited speeches, or impromptu. However, some cannot develop them efficiently because of their lack of practice at reading (Norbaevna & Yuldashevna, n.d.). As “reading is a communication habit that allows cognitive and interactive thought development of any reader” (Carrillo, n.d.), they may need exposure to different types of reading.

In 2020, Abril stated that inferential reading consists of the ability to deduct and infer information that is not explicitly in a text. As explained, inferential reading refers to the capacity for abstract information that is not at first sight.

According to Sajid & Fraida (2018), the reader combines these acquaintance connections with textual strategies to create a text conventionally. Their study on Saudi university students demonstrates that inferential reading allows them to acquire comprehension abilities and develop communicative capabilities because it gives the reader access to theoretical knowledge and common sense.



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

While the study states the benefits inferential reading has over students' communicative skills, other researchers conclude that inferential reading strengthens reading comprehension. Hall et al.(2020) claimed that inference improves less-skilled readers’ literal comprehension of text and inferential comprehension. Moreover, inferred information fosters students' reading comprehension through deep perception of the text organization. (Durán, 2018)

In general, inferential reading may be a beneficial technique to foster in a classroom, as it seems to boost student's literacy skills. However, as some students are not inclined toward reading, some strategies may need to be applied for the student´s improvement.

Activating prior knowledge, asking guided questions, reading aloud, or using words are context clues strategies that model inferential thinking. (Dewitz, 2017) These skills are necessary for understanding concepts and ideas, people's motivation, consideration of feelings, and character traits, resulting in reinforcement of the ability to comprehend texts and express oneself clearly. This could be because to understand a sentence, one must process each word and connect these representations to form an understanding of it. (Kendou et al., 2023).

Methods

Design of Study: This mixed descriptive research was conducted during the summertime from January to March 2024. During the first week of February, the sample group was chosen from the English School at Centro Regional Universitario de Coclé, this the English Sophomore Student from the afternoon shift, a total of 20 students. Later during the second week of February, a questionnaire via Google Forms was applied to them, recollecting 19 answers out of 20.

Results and Discussions

The most notable result is that almost 58% of respondents say inferential reading helps refine their communication skills. This suggests that students recognize the value of this reading style in improving their ability to communicate effectively and supports the idea that inference in reading contributes considerably to the development of communicative competence because it allows students to have a better understanding and in turn can express ideas more clearly and precisely. See results on Table 1.

On the other hand, 26.3% said that inferential reading improves their reading comprehension. This observation emphasizes the importance of argumentation as a means to delve deeper into the meaning of a text and draw conclusions that go beyond the obvious. Improvements in reading comprehension in turn improve students' ability to communicate more effectively by developing a fuller understanding of the message they want to convey.

Table 1.

Surveyed students' perception of how refining English Communicative Skills through Inferential Reading











Note. The table shows the sophomore students' perceptions of how inferential reading refines communicative skills.


ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Additionally, 10.5% of students emphasized the advantages of reading conclusions in the education of critical thinking which suggests that practicing the inference of meanings in a text, promotes the ability to analyze and evaluate information more profoundly.

However, it is important to highlight that a percentage of 5.3%, expressed disagreement with the idea that inferential reading contributes to the development of their communication skills. This shows that a small percentage of students do not see this type of reading as a way to improve their communication skills.

The results suggest that inferential reading has a positive impact on the development of communication skills in almost many of the sophomore English students at the Centro Regional Universitario de Coclé. These findings can be significantly involved in teaching, highlighting the importance of incorporating inferential reading strategies in classrooms to improve students' communicative competence.


Conclusion

In this study, the majority of students in the sample group somehow consider inferential reading to be a useful tool to improve their communication skills. Furthermore, reading is an essential skill in the growth of learning, being of great help to shape and develop communication skills. Overall, inferential reading creates logical and cognitive knowledge through prior knowledge while reading develops critical thinking and awakens reading comprehension.



References


Abril, C. A. H. (2020, Abril). Educación bilingüe: perspectivas desde el sistema educativo español. Factoria de

Ideas, 19.

Carrillo, M. (n.d.).(2024, March 1) La lectura y su importancia en la adolescencia. UAEH. Retrieved February 29,

2024, from https://www.uaeh.edu.mx/scige/boletin/prepa4/n10/e5.html

Dewitz, P. (2017, June 22). Making Inferences: 6 Essential Strategies. Read Side by Side. Retrieved February 28,

2024, from https://www.readsidebyside.com/blog/making-inferences-6-essential-strategies

Durán, N. D. (2018, Junio 30). Estrategias pedagógicas para el desarrollo de la lectura inferencial. Educación y

Ciencia, 23, 368.

Hall, C., Vaughn, S., Barnes, M., Stewart, A., Austin, C., & Roberts, G. (2020). The Effects of Inference

Instruction on the Reading Comprehension of English Learners With Reading Comprehension Difficulties.

Sage Journal, 5(41), 260

Kendou, P., Van Den Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karisson, J. (2023, January 6). ,. Retrieved March 2, 2024, from

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1111/ldrp.12025

Norbaevna, S. F., & Yuldashevna, X. G. (n.d.). IMPACT OF EXTENSIVE READING TO DEVELOP SPEAKING SKILLS.

Progressive Academic Publishing. Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://www.idpublications.org/wp-

content/uploads/2020/01/Full-Paper-IMPACT-OF-EXTENSIVE-READING-TO-DEVELOP-SPEAKING-SKILLS.pdf Nuñez. (2018, June 29). The Importance of Reading in the Development of the University Student's

Investigative Abilities. Revista Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, 2(1), 21. https://revistas.uteq.edu.ec/

Sajid, M. K. K. M., & Fraida, A. A. (2018, December 31). Effectiveness of Reading Aloud Strategies for Inferential

Reading Comprehension Skills and Text Difficulties of Saudi Students at University Level. Core, 2984.

What Is the Role of Literacy in Effective Communication? (2023, June 20). Southern Oregon University

(SOU). Retrieved March 1, 2024, from https://online.sou.edu/degrees/education/msed/reading-

literacy/literacy-in-effective-communication/




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Enhancement on Selected Grade 8 Students’ Reading Comprehension Using Collaborative Learning Technique in Don Manuel Rivera Memorial Integrated National High School

GBaran, Kim Reymar M., Espinosa, Marian F. Fernandez, Jemilyn O., Gaceta, Angel Mary Rose E., Garin, Archie V., Guerta, Jobert B.,

Reyes, Jovelle M., Solito, Jenny Ann E. - Philippines

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of collaborative learning on Grade 8 students' reading comprehension at Don Manuel Rivera Memorial Integrated National High School. Using a quasi-experimental design, 34 students were assessed through pre-test and post-test questionnaires, and the results showed a significant improvement in comprehension with the collaborative learning technique. Although no significant difference was found between individual and collaborative post-tests, collaborative learning emerges as a viable method for enhancing reading comprehension. Teachers are encouraged to adapt this approach to enhance students' reading skills, while students are advised to integrate collaborative learning into their reading practice for better educational outcomes.


Keywords: Reading comprehension, collaborative learning technique

.

Introduction

Reading is one of the macro-skills that are relevant components for language acquisition, where students get familiar with letters or words and the process of understanding the meaning of a text, which results in better understanding and helps develop the child's cognitive thinking abilities. Comprehension is the act of grasping the meaning of the text and constructing one's understanding. Students need to develop their reading abilities to improve their comprehension skills and gain knowledge about the materials or topics they have read. Therefore, reading comprehension is essential to expand knowledge by interpreting meaning, resolving problems, and comprehending what they read.

In a survey conducted by the researchers at Don Manuel Rivera Memorial Integrated National High School, it was brought to their attention that out of 153 students in grade 8, 6 were non-readers or 3.92% of the population. Given this result and scenario, the researchers were encouraged to help and assist the minority.

A classroom with an overflowing number of students is a handful for the teacher, which also affects the learning of the students. The number of students in a classroom could only add to the problem of why there is an increasing number of students who struggle with their comprehension level.

The collaborative learning that will be imposed on students promotes a positive environment because it creates a positive interdependence among students’ attainment of the goal. Putri, Zaim, and Hamza (2019) divide the benefits of collaborative learning (CL) into four majors: social benefit, psychological benefit, academic benefit, and assessment benefit. Achieving a goal would be possible if and only if the other students also succeeded with their goals. Collaborative learning simply explains the idea of a domino effect, in which a single domino could highly affect others in achieving the desired outcome the researchers ought to seek. Creating a small group of settings wherein they would create meaningful conversations that could enhance their proficiency, which is necessary for their learning, and consult each other to reach a group goal or task. In the process, the target language is used more frequently, and students are given lots of




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

opportunities to participate and become active rather than passive learners, all of which are the goals of the cooperative learning methodology.

Considering the significance of reading and comprehension, teachers have been tasked with ensuring that children receive support in developing functional literacy based on the standards. However, it is argued that the goal of making kids good readers should not be viewed as a burden to be carried solely by teachers. It affects students, parents, teachers, school officials, and almost every citizen. The responsibility of encouraging students to read, and not just read, but also understand. Hence, the researchers used the Collaborative Learning Technique to enhance the students’ reading comprehension.

The Collaborative Learning Technique is a type of instructional method that allows the student to create a small group where they can learn to work collaboratively with the members of their group to achieve their common objectives. The collaborative Learning Technique can help the learners practice their language communication skills because they can learn to interact with their group members, which may be beneficial for them. After all, the students can improve their language communication skills through cooperation or collaboration and improve their achievement in the given task as a group and as a student (Solanki and Acharya, 2019). Cooperative Learning, or Collaborative Learning Technique, is one of the potential aids in overcoming problems such as using the teacher-centered approach, which is not efficient enough to improve students' English proficiency, particularly in reading comprehension, and pupils being less engaged in the teaching and learning process. (Namaziandost et. al., 2019). In connection with this study, the Collaborative Learning Technique is a teaching and learning process that is focused on the learners, or a learner-centered approach, which has become increasingly popular because it has been proven by different studies that it has positive effects on a variety of outcomes, such as improving students’ English oral skills, reading comprehension, and writing skills (Nasri & Biria, 2017).

In addition, collaborative learning is a scientifically proven and successful learning strategy (Li, 2021). The idea of collaborative learning is that students are most likely to learn when they work cooperatively on academic assignments and share ideas (Li, 2021). Besides learning to work together to achieve a common goal or task that can help them understand and improve their language skills, collaborative learning is also helpful for students' reading comprehension. For example, using a short story in this collaborative activity can encourage students to work together to comprehend the content of the short story, enhance their reading ability, and develop their learning and their reading comprehension. Teevno and Raisani's (2017) study about English reading strategies and their impact on student’s performance in reading comprehension revealed that reading strategies based on a collaborative learning approach that includes the use of cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies that serve multiple purposes, such as enhancing the language's speaking and writing abilities, are effective in enhancing students' reading comprehension and should be conducted to help students in their reading performance.

Another similar study, Collaborative Strategic Learning is viewed as a Collaborative Learning Technique that can produce positive results for the community, improve attitudes, and enhance student academic performance. It is believed that using this strategy will provide students with more chances to participate in group discussions, build their courage, express their critical thinking, and grow their willingness to be accountable for their learning (Reformista & Khofshoh, 2022). In line with this study, Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) can also boost the motivation of the students to study for learning, comprehension, creative thinking, critical thinking, group work, and interpersonal abilities, and can be a solution to the difficulties associated with learning to read narrative texts. Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) encourages students to participate in discussions and learning while also enhancing reading comprehension and conceptual understanding (Anggeraini et al., 2018). The CSR method enables students to use a variety of comprehension strategies when engaging in cooperative learning. Strategies such as preview (which can motivate students to






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

gain interest in the topic, engage them to learn as much as they can with the passage or text in a short time, and teach them to predict what they will learn in the text that is given to them), click and clunk (students should learn how to keep track of their reading comprehension and recognize comprehension gaps), get the gist (teach students to explain the most important point in their own words to ensure that they have grasped what they have read), and wrap up (students create questions and answers regarding what they have learned or review the things they have learned). Therefore, CSR enhances reading comprehension in students who struggle with reading because the students will learn these strategies that they can apply to themselves and learn to read collaboratively (Izfadllillah, 2023).

Methodology

Design

This study used quasi-experimental research, also called causal-comparative, to determine the reading comprehension of 34 Grade 8 students. This is an empirical interventional design used to estimate the causal impact of an intervention on the target population without random assignment. In other words, it establishes a cause-and-effect relationship between or among variables. It typically allows the researcher to control the assignment to the treatment condition using some criteria other than random assignment (Thomas, 2020).

Participants

A total of 34 Grade 8 students from Don Manuel Rivera Memorial Integrated National High School participated in this research. The participants answered pre-test and post-test questionnaires to determine the student’s reading comprehension.

Data Collection and Analysis

The researchers provided a written consent form for the faculty members of Don Manuel Rivera Memorial Integrated National High School and determined which section had the lowest reading comprehension. Then, the researchers prepared the reading materials for three different short stories.

The researchers also prepared validated pre-test and post-test questionnaires that contained 20 items of questions that were connected with the three short stories, and whose contents were general information, the meaning of words, language features, and sequence that determined the reading comprehension of the students.

The researchers completed the data-gathering process in two days. On the first day, the researchers discussed the importance of the study, gave copies of the three stories and pre-test questionnaires to the teacher, and the teacher facilitated the students' answering those questionnaires during face-to-face classes. Each story needed 30 minutes to read and answer: 15 minutes for the respondents to read and understand the story, and 15 minutes to answer the questionnaires.

After knowing the results of the pre-test, the researchers ranked the students based on their scores and averages in those three pre-test questionnaires. The rank helped the researchers divide the participants into two groups: the controlled group and the experimental group, to which the Collaborative Learning Technique was applied.

After one week, on the second day of gathering data, the researchers gave a list of the names of those students who were included in the controlled (individual) and experimental (collaborative) groups: 17 students for the controlled group and 17 students for the experimental group. Then, the researchers discussed the steps in collaborative learning with the teacher so that she could implement the Collaborative Learning Technique.

The steps created by the researchers are:

Step 1: Groupings (the students were divided into groups by the teacher).

Step 2: Assign roles (the students divided the roles into categories such as scanning, finding meaning, reading, etc.).




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Step 3: Skimming (the students read the general overview or main points).

Step 4: Scanning (the students searched for words that were unfamiliar to them or difficult to understand)

Step 5: Find meaning (the students interpreted the meaning based on the context clues).

Step 6: Intensive reading (the students read the printed material and assign a person in each paragraph or in more than one paragraph; they can explain what they have understood based on what they read).

Step 7: Brainstorming (the students discussed their realizations, reflections, analysis, etc.)

Step 8: Evaluation (the students answered the questions about the printed material).

The Collaborative Learning Technique and individual reading process were applied by the students during their face-to-face classes that were facilitated by the teacher. Each story required 30 minutes to read and answer: 20 minutes for the collaborative process and individual reading, and 10 minutes for answering the online post-test questionnaires that were sent by the researchers. The teacher provided portable wi-fi for the students to answer the online post-test questionnaires. The teacher distributed the file of the first reading material for The Two Brothers that was sent by the researchers, which the students in both groups read and comprehended for 20 minutes. After 20 minutes, the students in both groups answered the online post-test questionnaires, which contained the same content as the pre-test questionnaires. The same procedure was followed with the second and third stories, which were The Cowrie Shell (Thai Folktale) by Supanee Khanchnathiti and The Aged Mother (Japanese Folktale) by Matsuo Basho.

The pre-test and post-test results were tailed based on the appropriate statistical treatment and techniques described in this chapter.

Results and Discussion

In this chapter, the results of the study are presented and discussed concerning the focus of the study, which was to determine if there was an enhancement of students’ reading comprehension using Collaborative Learning Technique.

The table presents the level of reading comprehension of the students in the pre-test for the stories of “Two Brothers," “Makato and the Cowrie Shell," and “The Aged Mother” with a weighted mean, standard deviation, and interpretation.

Table 1 shows the level of reading comprehension of the students in the pre-test. The story of "Makato and the Cowrie Shell" got the highest mean of 3.02, and SD of 1.41 and is rated as “satisfactory," while the story of "Two Brothers" got the lowest mean of 3.02 and SD of 1.41 and is rated as “Satisfactory” as well.

The overall mean of 3.12 with a standard deviation of 1.41 implies that the students' level of reading comprehension in the pre-test for the three stories is “Satisfactory."

According to Januarty (2019), a pre-test is a reading comprehension test used to gather information and gauge students’ level of literal and inferential comprehension before the actual implementation of a study’s treatment.

Table 1

Level of reading comprehension of the students during the pre-test.






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

The table presents the level of reading comprehension of the controlled and experimental groups in the post-test for the stories of “Two Brothers," “Makato and the Cowrie Shell," and “The Aged Mother” with a weighted mean, standard deviation, and interpretation.

Table 2 shows the level of reading comprehension of the controlled and experimental groups in the post-test. In the control group, the story of "Makato and the Cowrie Shell" got the highest mean of 3.78 and SD of 0.70 and is rated as “Very Satisfactory," while the story of "The Aged Mother" got the lowest mean of 3.57 and SD of 0.77, and is rated as “Very Satisfactory. For the experimental group, both "Two Brothers" and "Makato and the Cowrie Shell" got the highest mean of 3.99 and standard deviation of 0.94, and 0.80 and are rated as “Very Satisfactory," while the story of "The Aged Mother' got the lowest mean of 3.69 and standard deviation of 0.95, and is rated as “Very Satisfactory."

The overall mean of 3.68 with a standard deviation of 0.79 implies that the level of reading comprehension of students in the stories from the controlled group in the post-test is “Very Satisfactory." The level of reading comprehension of students in the experimental group has an overall mean of 3.89 with a standard deviation of 0.90, which states that the post-test results for the three stories are “Very Satisfactory."

Post-test designs, according to Malik and Alam (2019), are significant assessment tools that aid in the direct and effective evaluation of a course or lecture to increase student learning. The post-test score evaluation model's goal is to discern information obtained after the course.

Moreover, the result in Table 2 is supported by the study by Demirel (2019) about cooperative learning in EFL classes, in which the findings indicated that both the students in the controlled group and the experimental group improved and performed better during the post-test.

Table 2

Level of reading comprehension of the controlled and experimental groups during the post-test.













The table presents the significant difference in students’ level of reading comprehension based on the results of their pre-test and post-test.

The result presented in the table above indicates that the pre-test has a mean of 3.12, while the post-test has a mean of 3.78. The difference between these means is -0.66. Furthermore, since the calculated p-value of 0.00 is less than the alpha (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. Thus, there is a significant difference between the level of reading comprehension of students in their pre-test and post-test. Therefore, the hypothesis, which states that there is no significant relationship between the level of reading comprehension of students before and after the intervention, is rejected.

This is supported by the findings of Carrillo, Labre, and Valle (2019) in their study about the effects of cooperative learning on reading comprehension, where it is stated that the mean in terms of the post-test for both the controlled group and the experimental group is higher than the mean in the pre-test. Hence, there is a significant difference, as indicated in their study.










ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Table 3

Significant difference between the level of reading comprehension of students in their pre-test and post-test









The table presents the significant difference between the reading comprehension levels of the students in the controlled and experimental groups.

Table 4 presents the results of the controlled (individual) and experimental (collaborative) groups. The control group has a mean of 3.68, while the experimental group has a mean of 3.89. The difference between these two is -0.21. Furthermore, since the calculated p-value of 0.09 is greater than the alpha (0.05), the null hypothesis is accepted. Thus, there is no significant relationship between the level of reading comprehension of students in the controlled group and the experimental group. Therefore, the null hypothesis, which states that there is no significant relationship between the level of reading comprehension of students in the controlled and experimental groups, is accepted.

This is supported by the study of Rajaei, Talebi, and Abadikhah, (2020) about the effects of collaborative and non-collaborative approaches to teaching reading strategies, in which it is stated in their findings that the significant value between the collaborative and non-collaborative groups is more than 0.05, indicating that the difference between these two groups is not significant. Hence, this asserts that collaborative and non-collaborative reading strategy instructions do not impact reading comprehension differently.

Table 4

Significant difference between the reading comprehension level of the students in the controlled and experimental group.











Conclusions

This research focused on enhancing the grade 8 students’ reading comprehension through the use of Collaborative Learning Technique. As stated in the introduction, the purpose of this study is to determine if there is an improvement in students’ reading comprehension using Collaborative Learning Technique

Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn

The performance of the students in pre-and post-test scores was “Satisfactory” and “Very Satisfactory” respectively. First, there was a significant difference between the pre-and post-test scores of the respondents. Hence, the Collaborative Learning Technique helped the students enhance their reading





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

comprehension, which means that CLT can be an alternative learning strategy. However, there is no significant difference between the post-test scores of the control group who have done the activity individually, and the experimental group who have used the Collaborative Learning Technique (CLT). Therefore, there is no significant difference between the levels of reading comprehension of the students in their individual post-test and collaborative post-test.

Based on the conclusions drawn from the study, the following were recommended:

  • The researchers recommend teachers use Collaborative Learning Technique as an alternative reading approach for enhancing the reading comprehension of the students.
  • The researchers recommend students practice Collaborative Learning Technique when using reading materials to improve their reading comprehension.
  • The researchers recommend further studies about the enhancement of students’ reading comprehension using a Collaborative Learning Technique. Furthermore, they need to make sure that there’s an appropriate allotted time and that they can revise or formulate their collaborative steps in reading.



References

Anggeraini, Y., Novarita, N., & Afifah, N. (2018). Collaborative Strategic Reading in EFL Reading Classroom.

ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v9i2.2976

Carrillo, N. M. R., Labre, M. G. P., & Valle, V. V. Y. (2019). The effects of cooperative learning on reading

comprehension. Explorador Digital, 3(3.1), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.33262/exploradordigital.v3i3.1.875

Demirel, E. (2019). Cooperative Learning in EFL Classes: A Comparative Study on Vocabulary Teaching. Selçuk

Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 42, 344–354.

https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/susbed/issue/61823/925057

Izfadllillah, T. (2023). COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING IN TEACHING COMPREHENSION SKILL. Research

on Applied Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 1–9.

https://ejournal.unsap.ac.id/index.php/reall/article/view/594

Januarty, R. (2019). Improving The Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Concept Oriented Reading

Instruction. Klasikal: Journal Of Education, Language Teaching And Science, 1(2), 12–22.

https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v1i2.30

Li, K. (2021). Collaborative Learning and Academic Performance in Lyceum of the Philippines University –

Batangas City Senior High School. https://francis-

press.com/uploads/papers/8j3ZAF3qQUV0PwVgZPheOLkTfQgFoiZG0UNGg994.pdf

Malik, T., Alam, & Alam, R., (2019) Comparative Analysis between Pretest/Post-test Model and Post-test-only

Model in Achieving the Learning Outcomes. ResearchGate.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338478816_Comparative_Analysis_Between_Pre-_testPost-

test_Model_and_Post-test-only_Model_in_Achieving_the_Learning_Outcomes

Nasri, M., & Biria, R. (2017). Integrating multiple and focused strategies for improving reading comprehension

and l2 lexical development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied

Linguistics & English Literature, 6(1), 311-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.311

Putri, R., Zaim, M., & Hamzah. (2019). The Effect of Collaborative Learning Technique on Students’ Reading

Comprehension.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343907681_The_Effect_of_Collaborative_Learning_Techniq

ue_on_Students%27_Reading_Comprehension

Rajaei, A., Talebi, S. M., & Abadikhah, S. (2020). The Effects of Collaborative and Non- Collaborative

Approaches to Teaching Reading Strategies on Iranian efl Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Attitude

toward Reading. Ikala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 25(1), 55–73.

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n01a05








ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH


Reformista, M. N., & Khofshoh, Z. A. (2022). COLLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING (CSR) IN THE

EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Karangan: Jurnal Bidang Kependidikan,

Pembelajaran, dan Pengembangan, 4(1), 49-57.

Solanki, K., & Acharya, P. (2019). EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLABORATIVE LEARNING ON READING

COMPREHENSION.https://www.academia.edu/43294006/EFFECTIVENESS_OF_COLLABORATIVE_LEARNING_

ON_READING_COMPREHENSION

Teevno, R. & Raisani, R. (2017). English Reading Strategies and their Impact on Students' Performance in

Reading Comprehension. ranian efl Learners’ Reading Comprehension and Attitude

toward Reading. Ikala, Revista De Lenguaje Y Cultura, 25(1), 55–73.

https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n01a05Impact-on-in-Teevno- Raisani/13da8f424cb816b4b5b14faee6092ad9cc1f6e89









ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Academic Reading for Seeking Learning Opportunities

Gabriel Rodríguez; Marisstella Guevara; Alcibiades Reyes - Panama

Abstract

In a world where everything is becoming easier, students have forgotten how important it is to work on the skills that help their academic success. A situation that gets worse without the correct professional guidance. This research arises from the need to determine and expose the opportunities that freshman students at CRU Coclé can obtain through academic reading. This investigation was carried out through a Google Forms questionnaire with questions related to the perspectives that freshman students of 2023 have about academic reading and their experiences with such practice during their first year at college. According to the results of this research, the sample group did have a glimpse of what academic reading is. Furthermore, some learning opportunities were developed thus enriching some of their previous skills. Therefore, this research shows that the opportunities determined through this work are achievable since the students faced academic reading on a small scale.


Keywords: Learning opportunities, academic reading, English language, critical thinking, language skills.


Introduction

Academic reading is a critical component of higher education, yet one of the most loathed by English freshmen students. A study directed by Chandran & Shah (2019) states that “the main issue that has been significant is that although reading skill is regarded as the most important skill in the academic sector, it is not promoted and not successful as expected among the students” (p. 3373). Academic reading is essential for freshmen students in any aspect of language acquisition, even so, it is commonly overshadowed by other types of learning practices. Such a problem is tightly linked to students' lack of knowledge to understand the vocabulary implemented in this type of reading and their perspective on the analytical process of reading, which leads them to boredom and apathy. However, the struggle lies primarily in the lack of correct academic reading implementation and guidance because, as stated by Maguire, et al. (2020), “...academic reading expectations are often tacit and difficult to articulate, highlighting the need for more explicit support and instruction.” (p. 2). Therefore, academic reading represents a powerful tool to achieve different learning outcomes, a tool that is uncultivated among English first-year students and needs to be enhanced.


Theoretical Framework

Academic reading is a deep process that goes beyond understanding what you are reading. AR's primary purpose is to boost the acquisition, understanding, and building of knowledge through academic success standards (Miller & Merdian, 2020). Accordingly, academic reading requires the student's commitment to be successful in reading, as well as the teacher's instructions to guide the student to meet the requirements of such academic expectations. “Reading experts agree that competency in academic reading is learned, yet students receive very little explicit, discipline-specific instruction” (Howard, 2018, as cited in Wood, 2022, para. 5).

Likewise, academic reading is a great source of learning opportunities for students. Academic reading provides a great source of professional outcomes. Students who take a deep approach when reading use



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

higher-order cognitive skills, however, it acknowledges the reader with multiple benefits (Hermida, 2009, p.2). “It helps learners develop other related skills such as grammar, vocabulary, and writing” (Koch, 1974, as cited in Lalicic & Dubravac, 2021, p.24). Jenkins et al. (1984) stated that words are learned better if they are read from context rather than superficially and the more students read in context the more they increase the acquisition of new words.

According to Cooper (2022) “reading develops the critical thinking skills that are essential to success in a wide range of areas: skills of analysis, interpretation, and of being able to create an argument and explain it” (para. 3). Moreover, “metacognition is essential for the development of reading and writing skills”. Thereby, through reading, students can develop their critical thinking skills (Eser, 2021, as cited in Hicks, 2023, p.7). Besides, Cooper (2022) makes it clear that reading makes you enter a new world, in which you face the different techniques that writers use to carry out their work and in turn, you will also be observing new terms that could be added to your vocabulary. Eventually, you will be developing the way you express yourself, whether orally or in writing, because reading also develops your analytical skills. Hermida (2009) also addressed the problem that students do not differentiate between academic reading and casual reading, and that issue will later affect them diversely.


Methodology

The instrument for this investigation was carried out through a Google Forms questionnaire with 10 questions related to the perspectives that freshman students of 2023 had about academic reading and their experiences with it during their first year at college. The sample group was made up of 30 students, of which 13 were male, and 17 were female. 93.3% are between the ages 18-24, 3.3% are between 25-30, and 3.3% are more than 30 years old.


Results and Discussion

According to the students’ perceptions of their reading skills in English before they enrolled in college in 2023, 6.7% answered they had excellent reading skills, 56.7% said that it was good, 16.7% stated they wouldn't complain, and 20% answered they were not good at reading. Out of 30 responses, the majority rated themselves as good readers.

According to whether students faced academic reading during their first year as an English Degree student at CRU Coclé (2023), out of 30 answers, 86.7% said that they did face academic reading as freshmen and 13.3% said that they did not face it.

According to whether students received guidance for academic reading or not, out of 30 answers, 23 freshmen agreed that teachers helped them with academic reading by instructing them about the academic texts they were reading and making them aware of it, however, it is essential to highlight that several answers highlighted that only one teacher instructed them in academic reading. On the other hand, 7 answers stated that they did not receive any help from their teachers.

According to the students' rating of their experience regarding academic reading, out of 30 answers, 6.7% rated it as awful, 3.3% rated it as not well, 46.7% rated it as a work in progress, 40% as well, and 3.3% superbly.

According to the student’s perspectives on the learning opportunities academic reading provided them (during 2023). Each learning opportunity could be selected by all respondents (30), thus each opportunity percentage is based individually on 100%. Therefore, 83%(25/30) said they had new vocabulary acquisition through academic reading, 63%(19/30) had speech improvements, 67%(20/30) had a better understanding of English grammar, 37%(11/30) had writing skill improvements, and 20%(06/30) a critical thinking development.







ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

According to how influential is academic reading for students´ English language acquisition and its effectiveness, out of 30 answers, 26 answers agreed that academic reading is highly influential in improving the level and skills of the English Language. Consequently, 4 answers stated that it's partially effective.

According to whether, and why, their previous perspectives about academic reading could change if they had received some type of external motivation from their own. From 30 replies, 24 stated that their previous perspective on academic reading might have changed if they had received an external source of motivation because they would have been more engaged. Furthermore, it would have helped them understand the texts better, encouraging them to learn more and continue improving. On the other hand, 5 students were insecure about it since they stated that they can motivate themselves. Lastly, only 1 student said no.

If students consider that academic reading is promoted at CRU Coclé Why? From 30 answers, 8 stated that academic reading is not promoted at CRU Coclé. 20 answers stated that academic reading is promoted at CRU Cocle by teachers themselves and few activities. Besides, 2 answers were unsure about whether it is promoted or not.

According to what other academic benefits they think they can gain or have gained, through academic reading, out of 30 answers the most repeated benefits among all the students were: expanded vocabulary, broader knowledge, better critical thinking, grammar improvements, better pronunciation, and speech, helping exercise the brain, increased comprehension of complex texts, and increased memorization and research skills.

According to what other personal benefits (out academicals) students think they can get from academic reading, out of 30 answers the most repeated benefits among all the students were: better conversations during the daily routine, greater concentration, opportunities for personal growth, greater communication, empowerment, making students holistic, stimulating creativity and perspectives, promoting empathy and understanding, and increasing curiosity.


Conclusion

In conclusion, academic reading is a valuable sub-skill for CRU Coclé ESL learners, it is hence highly important to teach it from the first level. It has numerous beneficial effects if students master it, leading to better learning opportunities such as those determined through this research, which include: expanded vocabulary, pronunciation, and speech improvements, a better understanding of English grammar, improvements in writing skills, broader knowledge, enhanced critical thinking, and overall, increased comprehension. Moreover, according to the results found in this research, academic reading boosts personal growth opportunities, enhances communication, makes students holistic, stimulates students’ creativity and perspectives, promotes empathy and understanding, and increases curiosity. Becoming aware of these learning opportunities will make students' path to success easier. But to achieve this, both students and teachers must work together to practice academic reading until students master this technique, once they do, they will be able to experience the aforementioned learning outcomes. Finally, it is essential to address that to achieve the objectives and benefits of academic reading, this practice must be adequately promoted and implemented at universities from the first year of learning English as a second language.


References


Chandran, Y. & Shah, P. M. (2019). Identifying learners’ difficulties in ESL reading comprehension. Creative

Education, 10(13), 3372-3374. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013259

Cooper, L. (2022). Reading widely to develop critical thinking skills. Seven Spring Education Royal Pub.

Retrieved March 4, 2024, from https://www.seven-springs.co.uk/resource-hub/reading-widely-to-develop-

critical-thinking-skills/#



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Hermida, J. (2009). The importance of teaching academic reading skills in first-year university courses. SSRN.

https://ssrn.com/abstract=1419247

Hicks, T. (2023). The effect of reading habits on academic success. Grand Valley State University.

https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/gradprojects/389

Jenkins, J. R., Stein, M. L., & Wysocki, K. (1984). Learning vocabulary through reading. American Educational

Research Journal, 21(4), 767-787. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004767

Lalicic, A. & Dubravac, V. (2021).The role of reading in English language classrooms. MAP Social Sciences, 1(1),

24-26. https://mapub.org/ojs/index.php/mapss/article/view/16

Maguire, M., Reynolds, A. E., and Delahunt, B. (2020). Reading to be: The role of academic reading in emergent

academic and professional student identities. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(2), 2-

8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1254411.pdf

Miller, K. and Merdian, H. (2020). “It’s not a waste of time!” Academics’ views on the role and function of

academic reading: A thematic analysis. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 17(2), p. 03-35.

https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.2.3

Pagan, A. & Nation, K. (2019). Learning words via reading: Contextual diversity, spacing, and retrieval effects

in adults. Cognitive Science, 43(1), 20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cogs.12705

Wood, J. (2022). The Purpose and Practice of Academic Reading. Making Digital History. Retrieved February 10,

2024, from https://makingdigitalhistory.co.uk/2022/01/10/the-purpose-and-practice-of-academic-reading/








ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Plight of Challenged Readers Age Ranges from 13-15 Years Old: Basis for Proposed Intervention Program, June 2023

Cubacob, Dharline T., Oriel, Patricia S., Pereja, Kyla D.

Poonin, Althea Marie, Santos, Jewel P. - Phillipines

Abstract

Students who were quarantined encountered difficulties in reading and other problems. Hence, this research explored the plight of challenged readers with an income of less than 12,082, which typically involves low socio-economic status. In conducting this study, the researchers identified the causes of the difficulties faced by challenged readers as respondents. The study could be useful to the school as their basis for analyzing the students who are also challenged readers. The study could also be used as a guide to improve the challenge readers’ skills in reading and to propose an intervention for the students.

The qualitative research method was used in gathering and analyzing the data. Purposive sampling was also used to choose the five (5) respondents who reside within the geographic area of Laguna. A semi-structured, in-depth interview was conducted, and the results were analyzed using thematic analysis.

The findings revealed the causes of why readers are having difficulties reading. It shows that they have low self-esteem, are not exposed to reading, and because of family matters, affect their reading skills. Furthermore, the researchers found out that the socio-economic status of the respondents is just one of the reasons why they belong to Challenge Readers, but it is also because of family problems, and some are due to their leisure.


Keywords: Challenged readers, difficulties reading, intervention program


Introduction

Looking at written symbols and extracting meaning from them is reading. People envisioned how the characters viewed the world when reading. As a consequence, individuals gain a deeper understanding of others and hold fewer prejudices. In today's society, reading is essential because it enables everyone to keep up with the times. There were so many new things occurring in the world over time; technology and skills are evolving, and there is no alternative to reading and gaining knowledge to acclimate to all of these (Awal, 2020). Reading skills are one of the most essential aspects of the English curriculum at all grade levels. It was observed that teaching reading strategies is deemed a necessary procedure for skill development (Amin, 2019). Due to the rapid pace of technological advancements and the evolution of skills, literacy remains vital in modern society. Continuous learning is required to remain abreast of the most recent developments and changes, and reading is the primary means of acquiring knowledge and staying informed.

However, approximately 60% of students worldwide need to improve their reading abilities. The highest proportion of these individuals were adolescents (Vazquez-Lopez & Huerta-Manzanilla, 2020). According to the UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), 61% of adolescents aged 12 to 15 had not yet attained the minimum levels of reading proficiency. This occurred even though education coverage was at its highest level in history and the majority of pupils who lacked basic reading skills attended school. Their inability to read demonstrates that access to education is not a guarantee of quality. They must learn to tackle fundamental reading comprehension problems. Despite the widespread availability of education, many students,




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

especially adolescents, continue to struggle with literacy proficiency. The inability of a substantial percentage of students to read proficiently highlights the need to address fundamental reading comprehension issues.

Reading comprehension is an activity involving the reconstruction of the reader's knowledge, which requires the reader to interpret and analyze each section of the text to comprehend the actual reading content. Reading comprehension is a complex cognitive process requiring two primary abilities: comprehending the meaning of words and conceptualizing verbal concepts. It is also a social constructivist process based on prior knowledge (Sari et al., 2020). It examines the cognitive and interactive aspects of reading comprehension, emphasizing the significance of language comprehension, cognitive capacities, and the influence of past knowledge on the successful comprehension of written material.

Poverty was neither complicated nor a collection of multiple issues with extensive effects. The fact that many of the risk factors associated with low socioeconomic status (SES) inhibit brain development and function is perhaps the most significant finding for the education system. Moreover, the effect was even greater in cases of intergenerational destitution. Poverty substantially affects regions of the brain associated with language development and reading, according to one of the consistent findings. For many economically disadvantaged children, the fact that they frequently misheard words made matters worse. The inability to perceive precise language sounds results in difficulties with pronunciation and spelling (Sanchez, 2021). This statement underscores the impact of socioeconomic variables on cognitive ability and educational achievements, specifically in the context of language acquisition and reading competence.

Multiple factors influence a child's educational achievements, including their family, their family's conduct, their socioeconomic status, their behavior toward their parents, and so on. The majority of pupils with low socioeconomic status had poor academic performance, which led them to enter the workforce at a young age. It was discovered that parents from low socioeconomic origins were less interested in their children's education. After completing their secondary education, children from low socioeconomic backgrounds were more focused on employment than continuing their education (Vadivel et al., 2022). This highlights the difficulties that persons hailing from low socioeconomic backgrounds may have about their academic achievements, familial relationships, and the process of transitioning from education to the workforce.

Hence, this study aimed to explore the lived experiences of challenged readers from low-income families. The findings were used in crafting an intervention program to solve these problems that challenged readers may use to improve their reading skills. Especially those who came from poverty were the ones who would benefit the most from this study.

Objectives of the Study

This study aims to:

(1) To examine the reading difficulties of challenged readers as inferred from their narratives., (2) To assess the lifestyle of those students who have reading difficulties. (3) To craft an intervention plan that may aid the difficulties of the challenged readers and the adverse effects on their daily lives.

Methodology

Design

The research design used in this study was a phenomenological research design to understand a phenomenon's universal nature by exploring the views of those who had experienced it. This research was one of the most commonly used methodologies in qualitative research. to seek reality from individuals' narratives of their experiences and feelings and to produce in-depth descriptions of the phenomenon.

Participants

A total of ten (10) challenged readers who belong with a monthly income below 12,082, i.e., those with a gross household monthly income of less than 12,082 as discussed by Zoleta (2002) participated in this






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

research. Challenged readers are those junior high school students (grades 7–10) who have been categorized as "struggling" by their English teachers.

Data Collection and Analysis

The study's data collection process involves surveying the literature, identifying research gaps, and defining general and specific objectives. Researchers design research strategies, such as qualitative, descriptive, action-researched, or analytical, and develop an interview guide. They use inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify respondents, including those with a salary of 12,082 per month and those who are overqualified. A reading skill pre-assessment test is conducted to identify students struggling with reading.

Researchers identify and shortlist participants, secure their permissions and informed consent, and record their responses. Following the first session of interviews, transcription and coding take place. Transcription and coding come next, then the second session.

Thematic analysis is conducted to identify similarities in responses and validate themes if disagreements arise. Finalizing themes ensures they match the research questions, and the final report must meet the research's goals and objectives. The researchers write a draft of results, discussion, conclusions, and recommendations, demonstrating their overall understanding of the research problem. This process demonstrates critical thinking, creative problem-solving, and a deeper understanding of the research.

The final oral defense provides students with an opportunity to discuss their research. The manuscript is polished by proofreading it multiple times and revising the final paper. After publishing the research article, the research, including its scientific and practical contributions, is disseminated to others in a specific field.


Results and Discussion

This chapter presented and discussed the results and findings of the researchers corresponding to the problem of the study. The data and information were gathered within the geographic area of Laguna, where the researchers reside. The related literature and studies, as well as the theoretical framework shown in the previous chapter, were applied in the analysis and discussion in this chapter. Additionally, the table of the summary presenting the thematic analysis is also presented in this chapter.

Table 1

Summary of Thematic Analysis















Causes of Reading Difficulties

The respondents experience a lot of reading difficulties, including low self-esteem, exposure to reading, and family obligations. These are the common problems that the respondents reported.



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Theme 1.1: Self-esteem

Self-esteem is having confidence in one’s worth or abilities; having low esteem means not having or having low confidence in one’s abilities. One of the causes of the respondents' reading difficulties they have encountered low self-esteem in reading; they are shy, afraid, and lack confidence when they are asked to read in English.

During the interview, the researchers asked the respondents what difficulties they had encountered in reading. All five respondents answered that they have low self-esteem and confidence in reading.

The five (5) respondents have similar answers: they all encountered being shy and having no confidence in reading, and some of them are afraid to read in front of their classmates because they are afraid to make mistakes in reading. One of them encountered being teased by his classmates, which made him lose his confidence in reading. One of them endured bullying from his peers, which diminished his confidence in his reading ability. And most of them lost their motivation to read because they were afraid to read a passage incorrectly.

In summary, low self-esteem impacts the respondents' reading ability. Tajfel and Turner (2019) put forth a similar theory that claims people form a sense of self-identity through their participation in social groups. According to this theory, children from low-income families may have low self-esteem and a negative self-concept as a result of social marginalization and discrimination, which can impact their motivation and interest in reading. Comparable to what the respondents have experienced. They have low self-esteem as a result of instances in which they were humiliated for reading and/or ridiculed for their inability to read, resulting in a lack of motivation to engage in reading.

Theme 1.2: Exposure to Reading

Exposure to reading is how much time someone spends reading, and often they read on a daily basis. The researcher asked the respondents how often they read, or if they spend time reading at least once a day. Having exposure to reading helps expose one to different knowledge, new words, and ways of using language, which builds language skills. All five (5) respondents have no reading habit; they do not have time to at least read at home or even in school.

The respondents have similarities when it comes to exposure to reading: almost all of them don’t have time to read when they are at home or whenever they are free; they tend to spend their free time in leisure activities; and some of them don’t have any guidance or help from parents to help them overcome their difficulties.

According to the respondents' responses, a lack of reading habits and exposure was one of the causes of their reading difficulties. They cannot devote their time to reading because it must be spent with family or for recreation. According to a study by Dolean et al. (2019), limited exposure to enriching experiences is one factor that affects children's reading development. Similar to this, Chen et al. (2018) discovered that the parent-child relationship and the student's learning motivation both mediate reading ability. Most of the respondent´s parents were preoccupied with work, and one of the respondents had a fractured family, which resulted in them not receiving the support and assistance they required from their parents. This decreases their desire to enhance their reading.

Theme 1.3: Family Matters

The common cause of difficulties encountered by the respondents is family matters that concern happenings with their family that affected their reading ability and skill, such as the involvement of parents and financial problems.

Out of five (5) respondents, four (4) of them answered that one because their reading ability falls under family affairs. Respondent one (1) answered that he needed to take care of his siblings, and he has to work for their everyday needs, while respondent (3) said that her mother is busy with work because she comes from a broken family, and her mother needs to work for their needs, so her mother doesn’t have enough time to







ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

teach her how to read at home. Similar to respondent four (4), who said that he needs to take care of his sibling. Lastly, respondent five (5) stated that being unable to read was not a big deal to their family, and he doesn’t have anyone to seek help from.

In conclusion, the effect of parental support and family affairs on reading ability was very evident to the respondents. It was shown that the lack of reading development of the respondents was caused by an inadequate home learning environment and support from their parents, as well as by their social and economic status. In a related study, Reyes (2019) and Chen et al. (2018) found that the children's limited exposure to reading activities and insufficient parental support were two factors that contributed to their poor reading skills. And a similar study that discussed the relationship between socioeconomic status and the reading development of children, studied by Dolean et al. (2019). Whereas the respondents also experienced situations where they needed to provide for their family and did not have enough money to support their studies, they temporarily stopped attending school, which resulted in poor reading abilities.

Affects the Daily Lives

Three (3) factors affected the daily lives of the challenged readers while conducting the interview.

Theme 2.1: Reading Level

The reading level is simply a measure of the student's ability to read words or sentences. It shows how a student can read independently without the acknowledgement of other people. Importantly, reading level is a way to test the reading ability of the students and whether they understand something in a selection.

Three of the respondents say that they are having difficulties reading a selection.

As a result, the reading levels of the five respondents are readily apparent, indicating that they have reading difficulties. The findings of the study conducted by Reyes (2019) disclosed a lack of access to books and other reading materials, limited exposure to reading activities, and insufficient parental support. The study suggests that there is a need to provide more access to reading materials and reading activities for students from low-income families. Overall, the study sheds light on the factors that contribute to poor reading performance among children from low-income households in the Philippines and suggests potential interventions to improve their reading abilities.

Theme 2.2: Academically challenged

Academically challenged students' performance inside the school It is their behavior towards their teachers or fellow students. Mostly, the academic challenges affect the middle school level.

All of the respondents except respondent 3 agreed that they are experiencing poor reading skills in their academic performance in school.

In conclusion, the effect of academic difficulty was quite noticeable. According to what they said and what the respondents said, they do not know what they are reading. According to Dolean, D., et al. (2019), there is a well-established relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and academic achievement, with students from lower SES backgrounds having lower levels of academic achievement than students from higher SES backgrounds. It also emphasized the significance of providing support and resources to students from disadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances to facilitate their academic success.

Theme 2.3: Communication skills

Communication skills are a way for students to convey thoughts or ideas about something. Also, it focuses on the students' skills and how they understand each other. One of the causes of the difficulties in reading encountered by the respondents is poor communication skills.

During the interview, the researchers asked the respondents what difficulties they had encountered in reading. All of the respondents answered that they had encountered difficulties when it came to communication skills.

Based on the answers of the respondents, they are afraid to talk or communicate with other people,




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

especially when that person is good at English. They are afraid to communicate with other people because they cannot understand what they are saying because some of the words are unfamiliar to them.

In conclusion, the effect of communication skills on daily life has been extremely accurate up to this point, and students are still experiencing this type of circumstance.

According to Wood and Hartshorne (2019), many students struggle with language and communication, which can pose a daily challenge if not supported. It can manifest as academic underachievement, disengagement, and behavioral, emotional, and mental health difficulties. Many of these challenges are hidden and may never be identified, but they can have varyingly significant effects on a young person's language and literacy abilities, as well as their life opportunities. These difficulties with spoken language will also impair their reading ability.

Proposed Intervention Plan

The intervention plan consisted of ideas from the researchers and participants. It is analyzed and summarized to generate a new way to enhance the students' reading.

Theme 3.1: Enhancement of Reading Engagement

Enhancement of reading engagement refers to how the respondents will be inclined to read. This also refers to having a daily reading session and parental involvement in reading. Parents should facilitate their children's learning; however, in the case of the respondents that the researchers interviewed, only one had a reading session with his mother.

This means that parents and teachers should cooperate for the sake of the child's learning. Although you have a reading session, it will not be enough if they do not practice comprehension through worksheets. Yet, the other four respondents always hang out with their friends, which causes them to not have time to read. During the interview, the researchers asked them what they feel whenever they have difficulties reading, and they answered that:

This indicates that all of them have low self-esteem, and some are losing interest in reading. If there is no parental guidance for their children who struggle to read at an early age, they will have more difficulty reading. The Matthew effect theory also emphasizes the significance of early intervention and assistance for struggling readers. Students must engage in daily reading sessions, which their parents should supervise and encourage.

These responses from the respondents show that although they wanted to read properly, they could not do it because of their low self-esteem, which caused them to lose their will to read. It is also because when respondent 5 was asked if he did not try to read, he answered that:

Through his answer, the researchers observed that he is not exposed to reading English text. Educators and parents can help prevent the negative effects of the Matthew effect and ensure that all children have the opportunity to succeed in school and beyond by providing these children with the resources and assistance they need to develop strong literacy skills. Gray, Gore, and Craig-Hare (2018) also examined the relationship between access to high-quality reading materials and reading achievement for low-income children. They discovered that low-income children had less access to high-quality reading materials than their peers from higher-income families. This parallels the circumstances of the respondents to the study, who lack reading materials and are therefore not exposed to an English text.

Theme 3.2: Enhancing Language Communication Skills

The researchers proposed an intervention for enhancing language communication skills where the respondents must engage themselves in activities where they can practice their pronunciation and also enhance their vocabulary. This will contain worksheets about vocabulary and pictographs that can help them understand a word better as they cannot just read the word but also see its description and picture. In this case, once the respondents master these kinds of activities, it will help them enhance their language skills and be able to communicate and participate actively in school. Also, most of them have limited access to





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

reading materials due to their socio-economic circumstances. Reading materials are one of the factors that can help students develop their reading skills and habits.

There are difficulties encountered by the respondents in reading that reading materials can help overcome, and these are:

Based on the respondent’s answers, all of them have difficulties pronouncing words and also cannot understand high-falutin words. They cannot do their tasks correctly, and it also affects their performance in school as they cannot answer their teacher's questions during discussions. Moreover, some of them answered that during their examination, they could not understand the question as it contained unfamiliar words. Even though they asked their teachers and peers, they still could not understand it.

In a similar study conducted by Sweller (2018), he suggested that children from low-income households may have higher cognitive loads due to their limited access to resources such as books, educational materials, and experiences, which can lead to poorer cognitive and linguistic growth. This can impair their ability to comprehend complex sentences and vocabulary, resulting in reading comprehension difficulties. In addition, children from low-income households may be exposed to additional stressors, such as food insecurity and unstable housing, which can further deplete their cognitive resources and increase their cognitive load.


References


Amin, R. (2019). “Developing Reading Skills through Effective Reading Approaches”. International Journal of

Social Sciences & Humanities Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, pp. 35-40 www.ijssh.ielas.org ISSN: 2545-420X

Awal, A. (2020). “Reasons Why is Reading Important in Today’s Society.”

https://www.campuscareerclub.com/why-is-reading-important-in-todays-society/. Retrieved January 12,

2023

Bodine F. (2021). “Coding Qualitative Data”. https://www.geopoll.com/blog/coding-qualitative-data/.

Retrieved January 17, 2023

Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why poor children are more likely to become

poor readers: The school years. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 190–213.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113495500

Chen et al. (2018) “Effects of Socioeconomic Status, Parent–Child Relationship, and Learning Motivation on

Reading Ability”. Front. Psychol. 9:1297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297. Retrieved January 14, 2023

Cianciolo, A.T. and Regehr, G. “Learning Theory and Educational Intervention: Producing Meaningful Evidence

of Impact Through Layered Analysis.” Academic Medicine 94(6): p 789-794. | DOI:

10.1097/ACM.0000000000002591

Claessen, M., Dzidic, P., Boyes, M., Badcock, N., Nayton, M., & Leitao, S. (2020). Educators’ Perceptions of the

Impact of Reading Difficulties for Young People. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 25, 51-64.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2020.1734952. Retrieved January 12, 2023

David, A. M., & Dacles, J. R. (2018). A comparative study on the reading abilities of Filipino children from

different socioeconomic backgrounds. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 1-19.

Dolean et al. (2019, June 20). “Achievement gap: Socioeconomic status affects reading development beyond

language and cognition in children facing poverty. Achievement Gap: Socioeconomic Status Affects

Reading Development Beyond Language and Cognition in Children Facing Poverty”- ScienceDirect.

Retrieved January 14, 2023, fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475218308703

Dolean, D., Melby-Lervåg, M., Tincas, I., Damsa, C., & Lervåg, A. (2019). “Achievement gap: Socioeconomic

status affects reading development beyond language and cognition in children facing poverty. Learning

and Instruction,” 63, 101218.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101218. Retrieved January 14,

2023






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Education Development Center (2018). “Basa Pilipinas.” https://www.edc.org/basa-pilipinas/ Retrieved April

21, 2023

Education Links (2018). “USAID Global Reading Network.” https://www.edu-links.org/global-reading-network#:~:text=The%20USAID%20Global%20Reading%20Network,an%20impact%20in%20their%20communities. Retrieved January 12, 2023

Ganaden, A.S. (2022). “Learners’ Reading Skills during the Pandemic”. http://www.udyong.gov.ph/index.php?

option=com_content&view=article&id=11240:learners-reading-skills-during-the-

pandemic&catid=90&Itemid=1368

Gray, S. W., Gore, J. S., & Craig-Hare, J. (2018). Access to high-quality texts and its association with reading

achievement for low-income children. Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 447-457.

Huang, F. L., Ye, F. Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Longitudinal study of the effects of poverty on children's reading

development. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 19(3), 258-269.

Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Caravolas, M. (2021). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A

narrative review. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(1), 47-78. Barriers and Language Learners: A Review.

Retrieved from http://www.awraqthaqafya.com/2023/

Jaucian, M.B. (2020). “70,000 Bicol pupils can’t read – DepEd” https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1229537/70000-

bicol-pupils-cant-read-deped /

Jawili-Dacena, A. (2021). “SURVEY ON THE READING DIFFICULTIES OF K-12 LEARNERS IN SELECTED TAGALOG-

SPEAKING PROVINCES: BASIS FOR INTERVENTION.” ISSN: 2799 – 1091 Volume 1 Issue 3 | October 2021

Page 219-226. Retrieved January 12, 2023.

Llego, M. A. (2023). “Implementing the DepEd 3Bs Initiative.” https://www.teacherph.com/deped-3bs-

initiative/ Retrieved April 21, 2023

MCINTOSH, I., & WRIGHT, S. (2018). “Exploring what the Notion of “Lived Experience” Offers for Social Policy

Analysis.” Journal of Social Policy, 48(03), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279418000570.

Retrieved January 14, 2023

Merz, et al. (2019, March 28). “Socioeconomic Disparities in Language Input Are Associated with Children’s

Language‐Related Brain Structure and Reading Skills.” Child Development, 91(3), 846–860.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13239. Retrieved January 15, 2023

Michelle E. Kiger & Lara Varpio (2020): “Thematic analysis of qualitative data:

AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher.” DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Retrieved January 17, 2023

Mishra. (2019, December 17). “Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher

education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students. Social Networks,

Social Capital, Social Support and Academic Success in Higher Education: A Systematic Review with a

Special Focus on ‘Underrepresented’ Students” - ScienceDirect. Retrieved January 14, 2023, from

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1747938X1830304X.

Montilla, E. J., & de Guzman, M. R. T. (2019). Socioeconomic status and reading performance among Filipino

children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 19(4), 511-531. Communication.” Journal of Applied and

Advanced Research 3.1, 2018, pp. 29-32.

Peng, P et al. (2019). “A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics:

Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status.” Psychological Bulletin, 145(2), 189–236.

https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000182. Retrieved January 15, 2023Sandhya, J. (2020). 6 Language Barriers in

Communication. Retrieved from https://www.fictioncommunication.com/6- language-barriers-in-

communication/.

Qureshi, F. (2019, February 25). “Don't know where to start? 6 Tips on identifying research gaps. E insights.”

https://www.editage.com/insights/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps.

Retrieved January 19, 2023









ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´RESEARCH

Reyes, M. C. D. (2019). Factors affecting reading performance of Filipino children from low-income families. Asia

Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(4), 23-31.

Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2021). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills.

Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(1), 38-49.

Sanchez, H. (2021). “Poverty’s Impact on Reading.” https://corwin-connect.com/2021/01/povertys-impact-on-

reading/. Retrieved January 12, 2023

Sari et al., (2020). “Understanding the Level of Students' Reading Comprehension Ability.” Universal Journal of

Educational Research 8(5): 1848-1855, 2020 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080521

Sebastian, A. (2021, May 12). “Verbatim Transcription in Qualitative Research. ScriptoSphere.”

https://www.scriptosphere.com/verbatim-transcription/#iLightbox[gallery12202]/0. Retrieved January 17,

2023

Sirin, S, R. (2005). “Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research.”

Rev. Educ. Res. 75, 417–453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417. Retrieved January 14, 2023

Sultan et al., (2020) “TEXTBOOK DISCOURSE READABILITY: GENDER, READING INTEREST, AND SOCIO-

ECONOMIC STATUS OF STUDENTS WITH POOR READING ABILITY.” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39 (3). pp.

583-596. ISSN p-ISSN 0216-1370, e-ISSN 2442-8620. Retrieved January 15, 2023

Sweller, J. (2018). The Cognitive Load Theory: An overview. Elt Journal, 72(4), 180-187.based on student

consultation. Master of Philosophy thesis, Queensland University of Technology.

USAID (2018). “BASA PILIPINAS (READ PHILIPPINES.”

https://20122017.usaid.gov/philippines/education/basa-pilipinas. Retrieved January 12.

Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the

acquisition of literacy. Psychology Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2019). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel

(Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Vadivel et al., (2022). “The Impact of Low Socioeconomic Background on a Child’s

Educational Achievements.” Hindawi Education Research International Volume 2023, Article ID 6565088, 11

pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6565088

Vazquez-Lopez V, Huerta-Manzanilla EL. (2021). “Factors Related with Underperformance in Reading

Proficiency, the Case of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2018.” Eur J Investing

Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Jul 24;11(3):813-828. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030059. PMID: 34563072; PMCID:

PMC8544226. Retrieved January 12, 2023

Wood, L. and Hartshorne M. (2019). “Literacy: The role of communication skills”. https://www.sec-

ed.co.uk/best-practice/literacy-the-role-of-communication-skills/. Retrieved June 04, 2023

Yahua, C. and Xinchun, W. (2017). “The Relationship between SES and Reading Comprehension in Chinese: A

Mediation Model. Frontiers in Psychology.” 8:

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00672. DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00672. Retrieved

January 14, 2023

Zoleta, V. (2022). “Understanding Social Classes in the Philippines: Which Class Do You Belong to?”

https://www.moneymax.ph/personal-finance/articles/social-class-philippines. Retrieved January 14, 2023










ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

EdTech Embeddedness: Empowering Critical and Analytical Reading among English Language Learners (ELLs) of Pakistan

Imran Hussain - Pakistan

Abstract

In the Pakistani context, English Language Learners (ELLs) are approaching substantial echelons of complications in nurturing critical and analytical competence about reading. Misapprehension of texts, pressure to perform, cultural and contextual barriers, and comparison with native and flawed pronunciation are the foremost bases of reading anxiety among ELLs of Pakistan. However, it is noteworthy that fostering educational technology (EdTech) in an instructional context not only facilitates ELLs to overcome such confronts but also empowers them to be adept and dexterous readers. EdTech enables ELLs of Pakistan to have access to assorted reading texts, engage in interactive instruction, and endow them with personalized and customized learning corridors. It serves them through audio-visual support, scaffolding and corrective feedback, and analytical outfits for textual analysis, and sponsors cooperative instruction and access to progress tracking and ongoing assessment. As a result, EdTech has had a great impact in empowering ELLs of Pakistan to be critical, inspired, analytical, convinced, and proficient learners as well as readers. In addition, promoting cross and multi-cultural interaction, guided practice, drill, and supportive feedback, graphic illustrations and scaffolding support, SQ3R, practice, self-assessment and integration of educational technology are effectual tools to minimize reading anxieties and maximize analytical and critical reading among ELLs of Pakistan.


Keywords: Reading Anxieties, EdTech, Critical and Analytical Reading, Pakistani ELLs


Introduction

Critical and analytical reading shores learners to analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the perceptions accessible in the texts. It facilitates them to grasp the ideas and also to articulate their outlooks and opinions critically on the texts being read (Norbaiyah et al., 2014). EdTech engrosses the exploitation of computers, laptops, cell phones, tablets, and erstwhile technological appliances for instruction in general and language instruction in particular. Language instruction is propped up with audiobooks, interactive boards, flipped classrooms, virtual classrooms, multimedia, digital libraries, and digital dictionaries. Digital media can augment learners’ interest, eagerness, and association in the process of instruction using gamification, interaction, and personalized approaches.

Additionally, it unlocks avenues for exploration, experimentation, cooperation, and a sense of spirited competition among learners (Rosmalen & Westera, 2014). The soar of smart machines and digital gears has specified impetus to read texts critically and analytically to skim the pertinent information from a substantial spring or material. For that critical and analytical adeptness is exceedingly reliant on the utilization of technology and digital modes (Silvhiany, 2019). Insufficient attainment of critical and analytical reading grades in the low-level conception of the texts. Previous studies sustained the perspective that students at varied levels are not competent to outshine the requisite comprehension rank and are found deficient in critical reading skills (Mohd Zin et al., 2014; Zainal & Seng, 2017).


ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

To make up for the deficiency Sarjit & Gurnam (2014) suggested the need for training to slot in critical reading skills in English texts. Hudson (2009) avowed the need to make use of reading strategies for efficient nurturing of critical and analytical reading aptitude. To him, it is a concentrated process in which meanings are grasped from connected texts with the aid of reading strategies. Digital tools and EdTech assist learners in advancing reading fluency and accomplishing critical comprehension (Erten, 2018). Reading props up in nurturing the mind, psyche, emotions, and by and large persona expansion of the learners to be analytical and critical readers to convene the requisite of 21st century needs and skills set.

The appraisal of technology towards Mobile Assisted Technology (MAT) has demonstrated effectual for language instruction in all dynamics series from reading, writing, listening, speaking, grammar, and pronunciation through Smartphones, iPods, MP3s, and MP players (Chung et al., 2015; Wu, 2015; Ghani et al., 2015; Morshedi, 2019; Hazaea & Alzubi, 2016). Mobile technology is utilized as a versatile tool to practice and drill reading skills to attain the obligatory level of critical and analytical reading proficiency. In addition, the reimbursement of utilizing mobile technology in embryonic reading skills among ESL is highlighted in the studies' demeanor (McFadzien, 2015; Azli et al., 2018; Handayani, 2018).

Reading Anxieties

Reading is a fundamental dexterity in language instruction and English language is no exception. ELLs in Pakistan are striving hard to master reading as well as other language skills to be adept in critical and analytical reading. However, this facade is accompanied by copious anxieties on the part of ELLs in Pakistan. These reading anxieties not only impinge on reading disabilities, hamper critical and analytical reading, and have adverse imprints on comprehension but also lead to worsening ELLs' self-reliance and oral communication. The first and foremost is the fright that ELLs have about misunderstanding English texts during reading. This terror derives from the unfamiliar glossary, cultural barricade, and multifarious sentence patterns of the texts. It hampers ELLs' connection with the reading materials or texts.

Many ELLs in Pakistan thrash about the worry that they will not be capable of seizing the ideas being offered in English texts which leads to reading anxiety on one hand and a lack of self-assurance on the other. Another momentous panic or anxiety that is prevalent among ELLs is the stress of performing well in reading errands such as in academic contexts and standardized tests such as IELTS, TESOL, and TEFL. The eminence that the English Language has in the Pakistani context for academic and professional pursuits has further led ELLs to execute well which has augmented pressure and anxiety among them. It eventually leads to adverse impacts on their ability to covenant with reading materials. Cultural barriers that are implanted in English texts also impel ELLs of Pakistan to visage reading anxiety that hinders their conception of the texts.

Cultural orientations, contextual and local inkling, context-specific idiomatic lingo, and untried interpretations obstruct ELLs from promising a connection with the texts. The insight of competing with natives in terms of reading fluency and comprehension also escorts towards inferiority and inadequacy among ELLs in Pakistan. Anxiety about pronouncing words while reading aloud is an added dynamic that leads to reading anxiety among ELLs in Pakistan. When they are not capable of articulating like natives or in an exact accent they have to rob discomfiture and downbeat judgment from peers on top of instructors. This can lead to additional deterioration of the situation due to being disinclined to partake in oral and reading activities on the part of ELLs as they obtain infertile and hypercritical attitudes on the parts of peers and instructors.

Function of EdTech in Empowering Critical and Analytical Reading

The function of EdTech is very vital and versatile in dipping reading anxieties and nurturing critical and analytical reading expertise among ELLs of Pakistan. It authorizes ELLs by augmenting accessibility and involvement, fostering critical competence, integrating analytical reading strategies, and supplementing in coping with reading anxieties. Integration of technology in other educational spheres i.e. curriculum design, instruction, feedback, and evaluation can help budding learning more interactive and impactful with superi










ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

accent on embryonic critical and analytical competence among learners and ELLs in particular. Firstly, EdTech shores up pleasing the accessibility as well as the involvement of ELLs through interactive tools, gamification, and differentiated instruction. EdTech endows access to digital and interactive tools such as digital dictionaries, thesauruses, and annotated software to excel in the access and trust of readers.

Gaming tools such as points, badges, leaderboards, and certificates prompt the readers with practice and drills vital for reading adeptness. Differentiated instruction aided by EdTech permits ELLs to personalized and tailored texts or materials for ornamenting their reading proficiency and trouncing their reading anxieties. EdTech endorses the model of digital text which is supplemented by inclusive questions that sponsor ELLs to nurture critical skills and scrutiny of the text being read. Online discussion forums are also handy tools abounding by EdTech where ELLs and instructors can share their reading experiences and converse various levels of elucidations they encounter during the reading of analogous texts. It has a key persona in fostering critical and analytical reading aptitude among ELLs. EdTech upholds fact-checking through digital tools enabling ELLs to cross-check and verify the information being encountered during a particular text.

It not merely endorses effectual reading skills but also accelerates critical and analytical reading expertise among ELLs. In addition, visualization and summarization gears and note-taking Apps dished up by EdTech are vastly rated to nurture the facade of analytical and critical reading among ELLs. Visualization tools such as mind and concept mapping facilitate ELLs to seize the ideas and explore the arguments being appendaged in a text. Digital summarizing kits help ELLs grasp the key points, condense information, and advance critical and analytical reading recital of ELLs. Annotated software aids ELLs to keenly and critically slot in with the texts to underscore the key information and devise analytical questions out of the texts being read. Lastly, EdTech assists in redressing reading anxieties among ELLs of Pakistan through teacher training, equal access to reading material, and a balanced approach.

To meditate on reading anxieties teacher training through the backing of EdTech can target critical and analytical reading skills with technological widgets and gadgets. There is a dire need to minimize the digital divide to take utmost advantage of EdTech for sponsoring effectual reading skills among ELLs. EdTech is an exceedingly efficient device but it should not minis instructor-led teaching and discussion forums rather a balanced approach amalgam of both digital and conventional modes can dole out better to accomplish critical and analytical reading adroitness among ELLs of Pakistan. EdTech allocates ELLs of Pakistan to have access to diverse reading texts, and slots in interactive instruction and endows them with personalized and customized learning paths. It holds them through audio-visual prop up, scaffolding and remedial feedback, and analytical tools for textual analysis, and endorses cooperative instruction and access to progress tracking and ongoing assessment.

Practical Suggestions to Reduce Reading Anxieties

To concentrate on the fright of misapprehending English texts, it is desirable to furnish ELLs with texts that have plain vocabulary, easy-to-catch sentence make-up, and culturally pertinent texts. Inspiration among ELLs to enquire questions, acquire clarification, and catch themselves in peer discussions can be handy in alleviating such fears and anxieties among ELLs of Pakistan. To mitigate the stress of performance it is exceedingly recommended to enable a conducive and supportive learning atmosphere which must be escalation and progress-specific rather than merely attaining outcomes-based. Enabling ELLs to practice, self-assessment, and industrious feedback are effectual strategies to cultivate analytical and critical reading skills and ease performance-based pressure from ELLs. To catch better cultural and contextual association it is recommended to furnish culturally specific texts to ELLs.

Promoting cross and multicultural relations can also be handy in redressing cultural barriers that obstruct ELLs' connection with English texts. To address inferiority and inadequacy-related reading anxiety among ELLs, accent linguistic diversity, a celebration of learners' attainment, and supportive mentorship are highly rated strategies. To trounce pronunciation-related anxiety among ELLs, guided practice, drills, and









ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

supportive feedback on the part of peers and instructors can put the ELLs on the right path and refrain from budding reading anxiety among them. If the spotlight of attention is swung from perfection to communication then the shocks and anxieties of ELLs can be abridged to a great extent in the Pakistani context. Incorporating conducive and positive reading exposure through graded readers strategy, diversity, and relevant and extensive exposure to reading materials are also effectual gears to minimize reading anxieties and maximize analytical and critical reading among ELLs of Pakistan.

Structuring a glossary and acquaintance with contextual constraints through key terms, thematic vocabulary, and cultural references are highly valuable stratagems to condense reading anxieties and advance critical and analytical reading among ELLs. Besides, cultivating reading strategies through SQ3R (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review), graphic illustrations, and scaffolding support are also advantageous to lessen reading anxieties and foster critical and analytical reading proficiency among ELLs. Last but not least, developing mechanisms for plummeting performance anxiety through alternative assessment, a supportive environment, and integration of EdTech can be massive and impactful in tumbling reading anxieties and advancing critical and analytical reading among ELLs. It will empower readers to expand their poise and enhance their conception and aspiration of analytical and critical reading know-how.

Conclusion

Reading is an essential language skill and in the Pakistani context, ELLs are in front of copious reading anxieties that obstruct their ability to expand expertise in terms of critical and analytical reading. Reading anxiety consigns to the apprehensions and challenges that ELLs encounter during the reading process in general and critical and analytical reading in particular. ELLs reading anxieties comprise a fear of misunderstanding the texts, unfamiliarity with cultural and contextual parameters, the pressure of performance at an academic and professional echelon, faulty pronunciation during loud reading, and fear of incapacity to attain native-like reading fluency. However, it is noteworthy to specify that in a digital era, EdTech has transformed the situation considerably as it has aided ELLs, chiefly in Pakistan to not only curtail their reading anxieties but also abet them in gaining expertise in critical and analytical reading.

EdTech facilitates ELLs of Pakistan to have access to diverse reading texts, engage in interactive debate, endow them with personalized and customized learning paths, prop them up through audio-visual shore-up, scaffolding and corrective feedback, and analytical tools for textual analysis, and promote cooperative instruction and access to progress tracking and ongoing assessment. By leveraging the role of EdTech to the maximum, it empowers ELLs of Pakistan to navigate through the complex ELT landscape and to nurture critical and analytical reading adeptness by triumphing varied layers of reading anxieties. Apart from EdTech involvement, numerous other strategies are uniformly advantageous in terms of reducing reading anxieties among ELLs and augmenting their critical and analytical reading. These include cross and multi-cultural interaction, guided practice, drill, supportive feedback, graphic illustrations and scaffolding support, SQ3R, practice, and self-assessment.


References


Azli, W. U. A. W., Shah, P. M., & Mohamad, M., (2018). Perception on the Usage of Mobile Assisted Language

Learning (MALL) in English as a Second Language (ESL) Learning among Vocational College Students.

Creative Education, 9, 84-98.

Chung, H.-H., Chen, S.-C., &Kuo, M.-H. (2015). A Study of EFL College Students’ Acceptance of Mobile Learning.

Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 333-339.

Erten, I, H. (2018).Role of Vocabulary in Teaching Reading: Wiley Online Library

Ghani, R. A., Paris, T. N. S. T., Shah, M. I. A., Yussof, R. L., & Abas, H. (2017). Mobile Assisted Language Learning

(MALL) in Developing Second Language Learners’ Understanding of Grammar. Journal of Academia




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

UiTMNegeri Sembilan, 5, 187-208.

Handayani, R. (2018). Employing Critical Reading Strategy to Promote Students’ High Order Thinking Skills.

PancaranPendidikan, 7, 51-56.

Hazaea, A. N., &Alzubi, A. A. (2016). The Effectiveness of Using Mobile on EFL Learners’ Reading Practices in

Najran University. English Language Teaching, 9, 8-21.

Hudson, T. (2009). Teaching Second Language Reading. ELT Journal, 63, 89-91.

McFadzien, N. (2015). Why Is Effective Feedback so Critical in Teaching and Learning? Journal of Initial

Teaching Inquiry, 1, 16-18.

MohdZin, Z., Wong, B. E., &Rafik-Galea, S. (2014). Critical Reading Ability and its Relation to L2 Proficiency of

Malaysia ESL Learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20, 43-54.

Morshedi, T. A. (2019). Effects of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on Speaking Proficiency (A Case of

Learn Daily Mobile App). Reads Conference: 2nd International Conference on Advances Research in

Humanities and Arts, Milan.

Norbaiyah, A. K. Roose, N. S., Farah, H. A. J., &Juhaida I. (2014). The Importance of Teaching Critical Reading

Skills in a Malaysian Reading Classroom. The 2014 WEL International Academic Conference Proceedings,

Bali Indonesia, 208- 219.

Rosmalen, P., Westera, W., (2014) Introducing serious games with Wikis: empowering the teacher with simple

technologies, Interactive Learning Environments. 22 (5)

Silvhiany, S. (2019). Critical Digital Literacies in Education 4.0: Preparing Students for Uncertainties of Post-

Truth World. Lingua, Journal of Bahasa & Sastra, 19, 102.

Wu, Q. (2015). Designing a Smartphone App to Teach English (L2) Vocabulary. Computers Education, 85, 170-

179.

Zainal, Z., & Seng, N. M. (2017). Critical Reading Skills at Tertiary Level. LSP International Journal, 4, 117-130.





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

Reading: The Key to Success, Better Life and Educational Outcomes

Sandra Mensah Obeng - Ghana

Abstract

In an era characterized by rapid technological advancement and evolving societal needs, the ability to read proficiently remains a fundamental skill essential for success, better life outcomes, and enhanced educational achievements. Teachers are urged to provide a dynamic learning environment that promotes inquiry, discovery, and reflection by embracing a constructivist perspective. This will help students to develop critical reading skills and a deeper understanding of the reading material. Again, teachers can differentiate learning experiences, personalize instruction, and meet the requirements of a wide range of students by incorporating digital tools and resources. To enable children to become proficient readers who can succeed academically and lead better lives, this paper aims to provide insights and guide practice regarding the various instructional strategies and activities to teach reading.


Keywords: Reading, constructivist approach, teaching strategies, digital technology, better life, educational outcomes


Introduction

One of the goals of English Language Education is to achieve competency in the four language skills i.e. speaking, listening, reading, and writing. Of all the language skills, Maduabuchi and Emechebe (2016) describe reading as the most important and the basics for studying a variety of disciplines. One’s ability to read well contributes to an increase in knowledge and, consequently, helps the learner achieve academic success, a better life, and professional growth (Grabe & Stoller,2014). According to Saed et al. (2018), reading is a context-dynamic process that enables learners to accurately decipher the intended meaning of the target material. Vacca et al. (2017) also posit that reading occurs when learners can make connections between their previous knowledge and the new information and engage in critical thinking to comprehend, analyze, and evaluate the text. In the language classroom, teachers can employ a variety of reading strategies/ activities such as the use of prior knowledge, questioning, visual aids, predicting, etc. to enhance learners’ reading skills. The application of reading strategies leads to the development of reading abilities (Stanovich, 1986). This paper seeks to generate insights and inform practice on the various instructional strategies and activities to teach reading to empower students to become proficient readers who can excel academically and lead better lives.

Review of Literature

This aspect provides insights into the strategies to teach reading, the role of digital technology in teaching reading, and the constructivist theory.

Strategies for teaching reading

In the language classroom, teachers can employ several strategies to enhance learners' reading skills. These include; predicting, visualizing, question generation, making connections, and summarizing (Parris et al;1996). By making predictions, learners can use their prior knowledge and experiences to make guesses and formulate ideas as they read (Block & Israel,2005). This strategy allows for more student participation, which increases student interest and enhances their comprehension of the text. It is important to compare the

actual text’s results with the prediction process as it helps learners grasp the material better.



ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

Adler (2001) posits that visualization requires the reader to construct an image of what they have read. The reader retains the image in their mind as a symbol of how they understand the text. Teachers can encourage their students to create scenes, characters, and activities, or to write about the picture that comes to them when they visualize the text. Making connections is another strategy that can be used in the reading process. By making connections, the learners can draw on existing knowledge and connect the concepts in the text to personal experiences. According to Parris et al. (1996), reading takes on a deeper meaning when a reader makes connections between the text's ideas and their own experiences, opinions, and the things happening in the outside world.

Another strategy is questioning generation. The questioning process requires readers to ask questions of themselves to construct meaning, improve comprehension, find answers to problems, and discover new knowledge (Harvey &Goudvis,2000). By employing this strategy, readers can go beyond the text and engage in an in-depth analysis to enhance a better understanding of the text. Effective questioning increases one's awareness of one's level of comprehension.

Lastly, with the summarizing strategy, learners can determine what is essential when reading by synthesizing, organizing, and restructuring the text to enhance effective comprehension of the text. Employing effective strategies in teaching reading is crucial for academic success, professional development, as well as understanding the complexities of contemporary society.


The role of digital technology in teaching reading

In the context of teaching reading, language teachers use various digital technologies to enhance learners’ reading skills. Chhabra (2012) posits that language teachers can use smart boards to enhance reading skills by displaying text, images, videos, and interactive activities; this helps learners engage with the material leading to better understanding and retention. Rasinski et al. (2009) also assert that tape recorders can be used to enhance fluency skills in readers. As readers listen to the recorded version of the text while following along with the written words, it helps them to develop their fluency skills by internalizing the rhythm and flow of the language.

Yeboah et al. (2023) posit that the integration of game-based learning motivates pupils to come to school, actively engages them in the reading process, helps pupils to easily assimilate reading contents, makes lessons lively and fun, and builds collaborative skills amongst learners. The use of digital technology in reading activities makes the learning process more student-centered than teacher-centered; with this, learners can develop a broader understanding of the learning (Rakhmanova, 2022) hence increasing language learners’ autonomy and confidence.

The theoretical framework for this study is Lev Vygotsky’s (1978) social constructivist theory. Constructivists believe that learning takes place in a sociocultural environment and view learners as active constructors of their learning environment. Jonassen (1996) outlines four principles of constructivist learning: the principle of knowledge construction; the principle of active learning; the principle of social interaction and cooperative learning; and the principle of situated learning.

The principle of knowledge construction holds that teaching should be viewed as assisting students in constructing their knowledge and reflecting on it by guiding them in the process of making meaning of it, rather than as a means of transferring, imparting, or mapping the teacher's information onto the student. The principle of active learning states that knowledge construction results from the activity. Constructivists hold that experiences and interactions with phenomena are inextricably linked to our understanding of them. The inference is that the meaning constructed of phenomena emerges from the interactions with them. Interpersonal interactions play an integral part in how people learn. From a constructivist perspective, learner-learner and learner-teacher interactions are crucial components of learning. Students experience cognitive conflict from peer interaction, and humans all have a propensity to lessen this conflict and




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

reestablish equilibrium at a higher level (Piaget, 1970). As social beings, humans rely on interactions with others to determine their identity and the viability of their convictions.

According to the principle of situated learning, part of the meaning of a phenomenon is embedded in its context. Understanding and reasoning of phenomena ought to be grounded in the physical and social environments in which they originate. Information regarding the context in which learners experience phenomena is part of the knowledge and related skills they build about those phenomena. The more directly and interactively learners experience phenomena in a meaningful context, the more meaning they are likely to construct. The implication is that learning and teaching a new idea should always happen in the context of its real-world application—that is, in the environment in which the idea is rooted.


Implications of the theory to teaching reading

In the context of teaching reading, Yang and Wilson (2006) believe that teachers need to cease teaching reading by simply practicing reading and focus on guiding students to extend their ability to read constructively. They argue that educators must break free from the disembodied texts that are so prevalent in EFL classrooms while teaching reading. These dematerialized texts have no context, and no particular relevance to students, or their broader learning purposes. The books are usually selected by teachers or textbook authors to illustrate a grammatical point rather than to engage students in meaningful and purposeful reading practices. Third, teachers are not required to read on behalf of the students. Students may not need to read the material at all at times because of the amount of support that the pre-, during-, and post-reading activities can offer. Rather, educators should allow students to select books and reading strategies that best fit their individual goals and requirements. By so doing, it will enable learners to achieve success in their educational outcomes and to attain better lives outside the classroom context.


Conclusion

In summary, this paper examined the pivotal role of reading in achieving success, better life, and educational outcome. Through the lens of constructivists, the study delved into different strategies for teaching reading, recognizing the significance of fostering active involvement and meaning-making among learners. Additionally, the study highlighted the potential of digital technologies as essential tools for enhancing reading skills in today’s technologically driven world. As teachers, incorporating constructivist principles in teaching reading can empower students not only to understand texts but also to critically analyze and synthesize information, thereby equipping them with the necessary skills to thrive in diverse academic and real-world contexts. Moving forward, teachers must continue exploring cutting-edge pedagogical strategies and leveraging emerging technologies to cultivate a culture of lifelong learning and literacy excellence.


References


Adler, C. R. (Ed.). (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Jessup,

MD: ED Pubs.

Block, C. & Israel, S. (2005). Reading first and beyond: The complete guide for teachers and literacy coaches.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2014). Teaching reading for academic purposes. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M.

A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 189-205). Boston, MA: NGL Heinle Cengage Learning.

Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS´INSIGHTS

Jonassen, D. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

Maduabuchi, C. H., & Emechebe, V. I. (2016). ICT and the Teaching of Reading Comprehension in English as a

Second Language in Secondary Schools: Problems and Prospects. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 4(3), 18-23.

Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1996). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P.

Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 609-641). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

Piaget, J. 1970. The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.

Rakhmanova, M. S. (2022). The role of ICT in teaching and learning foreign languages. Oriental Renaissance:

Innovative, Educational, Natural and Social Sciences, 2(20), 307-314.

Rasinski, T., Homan, S., & Biggs, M. (2009). Teaching reading fluency to struggling readers: Method, materials,

and evidence. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2-3), 192-204.

Saed, A., Mohammadian, A., & Shahi, Y. (2018). The effect of using video technology on improving reading

comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 17-

23.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the

acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-400.

Vacca, R. T., Vacca, J. L., & Mraz, M. (2017). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum.

Pearson.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Yang, L., & Wilson, K. (2006). Second language classroom reading: A social constructivist approach. The

Reading Matrix, 6(3), 364-372.

Yeboah, R., Amponsah, K. D., Commey Mintah, P., Sedofia, J., & Kwarteng Donkor, P. B. (2023). Game-based

learning in Ghanaian primary schools: listening to the views of teachers. Education 3-13, 1-15.




ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

William Enrique Garboza Aguilar

Perú



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"It's a receptive skill that we have to improve to reach the best lexical words and expressions in our students. "



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"It's up to the teacher. The teacher has to motivate the students first. Most students don't like reading in their mother tongue, image in a second language? So the teacher has to be an artist to change in his/her student the way of seeing a reading like an important skill to be better in general."



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"Teachers have to use nice strategies, to motivate to the students to read. Select a text, divide it into pieces, put it inside the envelopes, and give an envelope with the text per group. Ask students to put the text in order, at the end teacher reads the text to check it. After that, it is time to do comprehension activities."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Anna Kosenko

Ukraine



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"In the modern world reading is one of the crucial skills. A person who has mastered it is sure to have many more opportunities for professional growth."



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"In Ukraine, an integrated approach to teaching languages is just starting to develop. Still teaching reading as a key competence plays a significant role here. In universities, courses have been developed to help students feel confident about their reading and I should note those have been a success. As for me, I always integrate reading into my classes"



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"A person who has developed good reading skills is always ahead as he or she can deal with bigger quantities of information which is critical in nowadays quickly developing world. Here I can not but mention exercises tackling skimming and scanning. Some students are confused by those, especially at lower levels of language, but when they have some practice they enjoy them and I use this kind of exercise quite often."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Jordi Sevillano Del Rosario

Panamá



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"Reading is a wonderful tool to increase and develop the knowledge about a language and culture."



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"My country gave new books and computers years ago to support the students and try to motivate them to read more by the use of the technology and new books with current information, but in this moment the government and educational system need an update to promote the interesting in reading."



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"Trying to promote the acquisition of a second language since childhood, because at that moment the children are excited to learn, they want to know and discover about everything, probably they will be very interested in learning a new language, new words, and everything. Besides, with young adults could be different because we feel shame about making mistakes, we want to learn but sometimes we block ourselves with overthinking. So, I think that by increasing the self steem of the students and providing a good and comfortable environment to the students; an environment in which they don't feel judged if they make mistakes, or teaching them that mistakes are something normal. Students are not perfect and probably they will need decades to learn the language. It is okay to make mistakes because you are trying your best, so my suggestion is don't be rude or tough with the students and give them enough confidence."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Barnabas Abangbere Atibiro

Ghana



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"Reading is the base for the acquisition of knowledge in many aspects of life. Through reading,one learns a lot from others’ experiences."



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"There is a deliberate attempt to foster reading among learners in Ghana. Learning, a US supported program seeks to promote reading in basic schools. GALOP, another program, provides funds to basic schools to help learning outcomes. Differentiated learning is also run from basic 1 to basic 3 to promote reading among students. There is improvement in reading abilities among learners through the DL in basic schools"



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"As English is a second language to many students, effective programs have to be put in place to foster the skills in reading. As a language teacher, your lessons must contain a variety of texts to sustain the zeal of learners. Resources like textbooks, charts, dictionaries, and story books should be available for the use of learners. Methods that allow learners to interact with and among themselves, like role play, discussion, drama, and debates should be encouraged in the English Language lessons. Activities such as reading competition, spelling bee and class journals will go a long way to inculcate the interest in reading among learners. News bulletins in classes can also be adapted in the language class for learners to present stories they have written to the class."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Shayira Sánchez

Panamá



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"Reading is key to improving at an educational level because it instructs us in different areas and helps us improve grammar and have better spelling. Reading takes us to a magical world, a world to your imagination with the type of reading that You choose, history, novels, literature and etc., reading is creativity and peace."



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"In Panama, many schools and universities celebrate book or language day. They commemorate this by inviting students to read stanzas from their favorite books. They insist that students read the book they want, we all have different tastes, and the important thing is knowledge. May I give you that book and may your interest in reading continue to grow."



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"Teachers can promote reading by first asking their students what type of reading catches their attention and searching for the right type of book, then assigning reading a page limit and asking students for a summary of what they like most about it. chapter of the book, whether it is a novel, history, literature, or poems. There are motivational books that can also ask students to say a motivational phrase in front of their classmates every day at class time to start the day positively."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Zeboniso Murodova

Tajikistan



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"Reading is an important skill that leads to a successful life. As an English teacher, I love reading skills and encourage students and teachers to read books. I always repeat to students and teachers that reading skill is a gateway to knowledge, creativity, and personal growth. When I taught teenagers, I hung on the wall different quotes of great leaders about reading.Such as a reader today and a leader tomorrow. We had a big discussion on quotes. Students shared their insights about quotes. I learned a lot from my students. Reading transformed my life. Teachers must be role models first. And share with our reading habits and our success stories."



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"The Ministry of Education and Science of Tajikistan has implemented various national reading programs to encourage reading among students of all ages. I am going to share one popular reading competition. It is launched and sponsored by the initiative of the Honorable Leader of our Nation, to motivate teenagers, young adults, and even adults and children all over the country tha they read books with great pleasure. this contest is called "The Dawn of Wisdom is a Book" (Фурӯғи субҳи доноӣ китоб аст). It has 5 or 6 nominations. Everyone can participate including pupils and students of all levels of educational institutions, as well as masters, postgraduates, doctoral students, and citizens of the country. This contest is very popular now in my country.The winners in different nominations are awarded cash. I am very happy to see students from our university are engaged in reading Tajik and world literature books. The competition aims to increase and encourage interest in reading, strengthen cultural memory, pay attention to national and cultural values, strengthen the feeling of creativity and self-knowledge, enrich the vocabulary, and strengthen the spiritual world. "



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"Teachers can empower students to become proficient L2 readers by implementing some activities. First, create a positive reading environment. It would be better to have a mini-library in the classroom. I encouraged even students also create their mini-books and put them in the bookshelf too. I asked students what type of book they would like to have on the shelf. The second is to foster...





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Zeboniso Murodova

Tajikistan



CONTRIBUTE


" ...a love to reading. When I was teaching in high school, we had book discussions. Students shared the books they read with each other. They completed the book report and wrote a recommendation to read this or that book. All four skills were engaged. The third incorporated technology. We joined one online project, Folk Tale, around the world. I encouraged students to type in MS Word the Tajik folk tale that they translated from Tajik into English and then submit it to the discussion platform online. It was a fun project Students improved their digital literacy skills. We had 34 translated Taik folk tales thanks to this project, and then I published that into a book and shared them with all schools as additional materials for developing reading skills. Students draw their drawings to each tale. Another strategy is to celebrate reading achievements. Students who read the book and I took their photos, made posters, and hung them on the wall. To recognize and celebrate my students' reading achievements, I printed awards and certificates. Another strategy was to invite my former students from the Access project to read books to my new students to motivate them to read.. Students learn from students better."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Jomar Calixto Catano

Philippines



TALK ABOUT IT

What can you say about "Reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes?"


"Reading is not only a gateway to knowledge but also a key to success, as it enhances critical thinking, and problem-solving skills, and expands vocabulary. It fosters a better life by broadening perspectives and facilitating personal growth. Additionally, it significantly improves educational outcomes by promoting academic achievement and overall cognitive development."



COMPARE AND CONTRAST

What has been done in your country about fostering "Reading" to promote student´s success, better life, and educational outcomes at schools?


"In my country, various initiatives have been implemented to foster reading among students and promote their success, better life, and educational outcomes. These initiatives aim to cultivate a culture of reading both inside and outside of schools. One notable effort is the establishment of school libraries or reading corners in educational institutions. These spaces are equipped with a wide range of books catering to different reading levels and interests. Students are encouraged to explore these libraries, borrow books, and engage in independent reading. Additionally, schools often organize library periods or reading sessions where students can dedicate time to read and discuss books. To further promote reading, reading programs and competitions are organized at both the school and national levels. These initiatives incentivize students to read more and develop a love for books. Book clubs and reading circles are also formed to provide students with a platform to discuss and share their reading experiences. Furthermore, collaborations with local libraries, authors, and publishers play a vital role in fostering reading. Authors are invited to give talks or conduct workshops in schools, promoting their books and encouraging students to immerse themselves in reading. Local libraries also participate by organizing book fairs or mobile library services, allowing students to access a wide range of books. To complement these efforts, schools integrate reading into the curriculum. Reading comprehension exercises and assignments are given to students across different subjects, emphasizing the importance of literacy skills in academic success. Teachers also incorporate reading materials that align with students' interests and cater to diverse learning styles. Overall, these initiatives reflect a collective effort to foster reading in schools, thereby promoting students' success, shaping a better life through knowledge acquisition, and improving their educational outcomes."



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.






ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Jomar Calixto Catano

Philippines



CONTRIBUTE

How can teachers promote "Reading" as a tool for students to empower their knowledge acquisition, mostly in L2 (second language acquisition), so gaining success, better life, and educational outcomes? Provide a sample of activities or suggestions about it to other teachers worldwide.


"Teachers can play a crucial role in promoting reading as a tool for knowledge acquisition, especially in second language acquisition (L2). Here are some activities and suggestions for teachers to empower their students through reading:

1. Set reading goals: Encourage students to set personal reading goals, such as finishing a certain number of books or exploring different genres. This helps students take ownership of their reading journey and motivates them to actively seek out new materials.

2. Provide a variety of reading materials: Offer a range of reading materials, including books, magazines, articles, and online resources, to cater to different interests and reading levels. Consider multicultural and diverse texts to engage students from various backgrounds and promote inclusivity.

3. Extensive reading: Implement an extensive reading program where students have dedicated class time for reading. Let them choose books of their interest and provide opportunities for independent reading. Allow students to articulate their opinions and share recommendations with their peers, creating a sense of community around reading.

4. Reading circles/book clubs: Organize reading circles or book clubs within the classroom to foster discussion and promote critical thinking. Students can read the same book or individual texts related to a theme and then engage in group discussions or presentations. This encourages comprehension, collaboration, and language practice.

5. Reading journals/reflective writing: Have students maintain reading journals or blogs where they can write about their reading experiences, summarize the plot, reflect on the author's use of language, or discuss their favorite parts. This helps develop their writing skills and encourages deeper engagement with the texts.

6. Vocabulary-building activities: Connect reading with vocabulary acquisition by using context clues and word lists from the reading materials. Encourage students to keep a vocabulary notebook where they jot down new words, their definitions, and examples of usage from the texts. Regularly review and integrate these new words into classroom activities.

7. Reading comprehension exercises: Develop reading comprehension exercises that focus on various reading skills, such as inferencing, summarizing, and identifying main ideas. Scaffold the activities according to the student’s language proficiency levels, gradually moving toward more complex texts as their skills improve.

8. Use technology: Incorporate technology tools, such as e-books or online platforms, to make reading materials more accessible and interactive. Students can engage in online discussions, take quizzes about the readings, or even collaborate on digital reading projects.

9. Guest speakers/field trips: Invite guest speakers, such as authors or experts in relevant fields, to share their experiences and insights with the students. Arrange field trips to libraries, bookstores, or literary festivals to immerse students in a reading-rich environment.





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS COLLABORATIVE CORNER

Jomar Calixto Catano

Philippines



10. Celebrate reading: Organize reading events or celebrations like book fairs, author visits, or storytelling sessions. These events enhance the overall reading experience, foster a love for books, and expose students to different genres and authors. By implementing these activities and suggestions, teachers can leverage reading as a powerful tool for students to enhance their knowledge acquisition, language proficiency, and overall educational outcomes. It allows students to develop critical thinking skills, expands their vocabulary, and cultivates a lifelong love for reading that can benefit them in all aspects of life.


Reading is truly a transformative tool that has the potential to empower individuals and enhance their educational journeys. It not only improves language proficiency but also fosters creativity, empathy, and critical thinking skills. By promoting reading as a key to success, better life, and educational outcomes, we can equip students with the necessary tools to navigate the complexities of the modern world. Moreover, the benefits of reading extend beyond academic achievements, as it enriches personal growth, cultivates a love for lifelong learning, and broadens perspectives. As educators, it is our responsibility to create an environment that promotes reading, celebrates diverse voices, and nurtures a passion for literature. By instilling a love for reading in our students, we are setting them on a path towards success, personal fulfillment, and a brighter future."





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS´ IMPRESSIONS

"I just would like to add that reading can increase our knowledge and our way of speaking to talk with more security and style."

_Edwin Espinoza - Panama

"I learnt steps that can help me prevent my students from cyberbullying. I also learnt what cyberbullying is and what to do to prevent people from its drawbacks."

_Abdoul Karim Sogodogo - Mali

"The point of view and the way other professionals work is indeed a great help to improve my classes and make them better. It's like a guide, so I appreciate every opportunity I get to learn fronm them.""

_Angel Solano - Panamá

"I have improved my skills as a teacher of English Language through IELTA"

_Isaac Hinneh - Ghana

"It was wonderful. IELTA provides relevant information about teaching languages."

_Shobha Sharma - India

"It has really good for me it was interesting because it is always a surprise for me to know the different opinion and perspective of people all around the world that have a different environment than me, it is quite fun."

_Juan José Camargo Castillo - Panamá


ON THIS SECTION

It is a collection of some teachers´ feedback and testimony after participating in the IELTA Teachers´ Forum sessions.

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS´ IMPRESSIONS

"This topic is very relevant nowadays because most of the student do not like to read and this is the key to success if we want to learn a second language. I am in agreement that read is a key to success for everything we want to know. It is a general topic that is involved in our daily routine."

_Lisbeth Moya - Panama

"Useful and enjoy this breakrooms to share experience and making summaries from that. The topics are updated and empower our academic life."

_Karina Salas - Perú

"It was really good. The speaker was outstanding with his opinion about the importance of the reading. Because it help us to improve in our personal and professional life.”

Elisa Melissa Hu Wang - Panamá


"The session, the moderators ad speakers are spectacular. Congratulations to all! It helps me grow personally and professionally."

_Shiela Marie Echanez - Philippines


"It was very interesting and I lean more. They give me more ideas and information"

_Alexandra Sol Baca Calderón - Perú


"the sessions I have participated in have contributed to different aspects of my life. Getting to know different cultures, education and improving my English skills."

_Aldo Jair Martínez Ureña - Panamá



ON THIS SECTION

It is a collection of some teachers´ feedback and testimony after participating in the IELTA Teachers´ Forum sessions.

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

TEACHERS´ IMPRESSIONS

"This has been an enriching experience. Exchanging and learning from teachers from other countries is always beneficial. IELTA Teachers's Forum has permitted me to have new knowledge that will help me improve my teaching skills and upgrade my learners performance."

_Amadou DIAKITE - Mali



"Reading is a good way to learn by ourselves. Thank you for the advice shared. IELTA supports me a lot with knowledge, by being part of the audience help me to have an open mind and even use tool to improve my English Skill."

_Tomas Rodríguez - Panama

"I enjoyed the forum, and I gained a lot of knowledge. The speaker was indeed great and remarkable...[I]t helped me enhance my teaching career."

_Cherry Galang Reyes - Philippines


"During the session I felt very good since personally I am a student who has a hard time concentrating and when I read this it gets worse, but they taught me that I am not the only one who goes through this situation and they gave us tools that could improve understanding and fluency at the time of reading"

_Daurys Anette Márquez Ortega - Panamá


"I feel motived with of all those topics that they mentioned and how to improve my knowledge through reading."

_Harry Ng - Panamá


ON THIS SECTION

It is a collection of some teachers´ feedback and testimony after participating in the IELTA Teachers´ Forum sessions.

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

More about IELTA

International English Language Teachers Association


MISSION STATEMENT

To provide high-quality international standard programs to English language teachers, researchers, and learners around the world to enhance their human, professional, and scientific skills through respectful, collaborative, cooperative, critical, and intercultural interaction.


VISION STATEMENT

To be a reference model of innovative, academic, and organizational quality, which contributes to educational improvement by creating a community of professionals in every country in the world who can build dynamic and supportive learning environments and ultimately a better world.


IELTA has branches in 42 countries and still growing.



Find us at https://www.ieltassociation.org


Facebook page: https://web. facebook.com/ieltassociation





ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

More about IELTA

IELTA BOARD

President - Neil Arevalo Alcántara - PERU

Vice President - Ms. Sola Abou Zeid - LEBANON

General Scecretary - Dr. Afsheen Salahuddin- PAKISTAN

Academic Department Director - Dr. Glen P. Cortezano - PHILIPPINES

Administrative Department Director - Dr. Carlo Magno - PERU

International Affairs Director - Ebenezer Osafo Aikins - GHANA

Research Development Coordinator - Yuliana I. Vásquez G. - PANAMA

Teachers´Development Coordinator - Paulina Kazmierczak Majdzinska - POLAND

Learners´Development Coordinator - Nirmaladevi Kandasamy - MALAYSIA


COUNTRIES AMBASSADORS

Nawid Sanjary - AFGANISTAN

Mohandarezki Lahdiri - ALGERIA

Adelino Matías Candumbo - ANGOLA

María Gabriela Portal - ARGENTINA

Gayane Vardanyan - ARMENIA

Siddhartha Shekhar Biswas - BANGLADESH

Eslyn Alcira Escudero Gutierrez - BOLIVIA

Vilma Da Luz Barbosa - BRAZIL

Anestin Chi - CAMEROON

Martha Olivia Ogoño Caraguay - ECUADOR

Huwaida Fahim Alabassi - EGYPT

Getu Teshome Fekata - ETHIOPIA

Celestine Ateh Akechu - GANA

Doreen Dela Agbedoe - GHANA

Georgia Maneta - GREECE

Kalyani Rao B. - INDIA

Fajarudin Akbar - INDONESIA

Akram Shaaban Aboud - IRAQ

Ishangaliyeva Aigul Maksotovna - KAZAHKSTAN

Irene Musau - KENYA

Salma Abou-Azar Nammour - LEBANON

Nirmaladevi Kandasamy - MALAYSIA

Chitan Malle - MALI

Mahalutchmee Runghsawmee - MAURITIUS

Burea Svetlana - MOLDOVA

Sujeet Karki - NEPAL

Darzee Mendieta - NICARAGUA

Hamisu Hamisu Haruna - NIGERIA

Salman Siraj Rajput - PAKISTAN

Kairo Guillén - PANAMA

Gabriela Jakelina Huaroc Carbajal - PERU

Reynald Alfred G. Sy - PHILIPPINES

Paulina Kazmierczak- Majdzinska - POLAND

Anastasia Arkharova - RUSSIA

Jean Bosco Ngizwenayo - RWANDA

Rokhaya Ndoye - SENEGAL

Ming Yao Hsiung - TAIWAN

Ahmed Yakoubi - TUNISIA

Klara Nazmutdinova - UZBEKISTAN

Nguyen Thi Kim Chun - VIETNAM


ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

EDITORIAL BOARD

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724

The current edition we developed required teachers to meet and discuss in the twelfth episode of the IELTA TEACHERS FORUM about "READING: THE KEY TO SUCCESS, BETTER LIFE, AND EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES". They provided their knowledge based on their English language teaching experiences and ideas of the topic to support other teachers worldwide, 2024.

Moreover, all of the scientific articles published in this issue were revised and analyzed by invited external peer revisers.

IELTA and the Editorial Team of the Teachers Forum Insights Journal are not responsible for the authors´manuscripts and insights provided for publication in any

of the journal issues.

ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION NUMBER 11387724